Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019)

"Susan Hares" <> Sun, 03 November 2019 00:56 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC65A12002F for <>; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 17:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.347
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t8VwYgGurEJg for <>; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 17:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DB67120020 for <>; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 17:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=;
From: Susan Hares <>
To: "'Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)'" <>, 'idr wg' <>
References: <01a301d58f25$8c17ce70$a4476b50$> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 20:56:52 -0400
Message-ID: <008e01d591e1$94e98a20$bebc9e60$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_008F_01D591C0.0DD7EA20"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIvbKtAYhFbVOZK3befDkYvA1tdwAKQYvKgprBmfsA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 191102-0, 11/02/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 00:56:59 -0000



Thank you for updating the report card.   2 implementation are enough to go to the IESG.  If the other ones come back, we can add them later.




From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) [] 
Sent: Saturday, November 2, 2019 9:39 AM
To: Susan Hares; 'idr wg'
Subject: RE: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019)


Hi Sue,


I see that there are only 2 Cisco implementations on the report now and I can confirm that they have interoperated. I am not sure about other implementations and I am not aware of their interoperability aspects.





From: Idr <> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: 30 October 2019 18:56
To: 'idr wg' <>
Subject: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019)


This begins a 2 week WG last call for draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt. 


The first thing the authors need to do during the WG LC is to indicate whether the protocol implementation report  on this draft is accurate on the IDR Wiki:


The IDR WG needs to know whether the 4 implementations indicated (2 cisco and 2 Huawei) have interoperated using this TLV code point.   The current web page leaves some doubt. 


Cheerily, Susan Hares