Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard

Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> Fri, 21 April 2017 20:27 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899B5129404 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ERbR9ZOGyar3 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EFA0127B57 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id m123so25628959wma.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=BA5bdcvm6iGnsyzrlbC+4KNivU7FfQBhLMSjw28j65o=; b=0ytFGO2z0Rp57m8z1IY8Odrn47Yvn/87ACbty3rbenHcunHO3qpIuMlc2du1+TkJDY o2I0ns8pJBUvkGv423YHwIr1DfDS19Y/eOnywwliTaypth7AseZSt8zWByksOsW5tqnA H/LZapdUFl6lTISfhTkoHFnCUjIxPRgjaGp7AhtTsnPowTEC35+z+CqJdk9+5/3Bxj6t nKaQ5F4BID7IcwL/qu1UOtFQzPzJleDjUIiSsC2X7bsF1+kRKuwHXMng0yB7AVBW5GIg bpySbaP4Nl6Rjxa/nvKUMtu7eASN8b+vZlE3+w1TJzzWN3lpkHuFgh+lhduRTmbaHDfH uSmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=BA5bdcvm6iGnsyzrlbC+4KNivU7FfQBhLMSjw28j65o=; b=R+k6eFsfbp18qghkHptegzFaPreabqQROnGYHVKRZAyAqGOrLBxfiiuO61nZ9/ySff 7IVB0eFYBIb3UcFil1fiHJT55YtaGl+h5mCOgyF0sdhd8Znjc1wZp4LcVuaDTaFnXflK Jv2loR1Paq2z1G0JYZ8IRmioCJG8qhjxZV//v/WvIrTETzsLgx++JNRH0au4L2NFHvPk 0ZNuAzXtZFP5YHTdaAf3HTPc5Y1/+7f1NdzINVB0E9MBOOwNcP0V0RUNLcwfOUvJA1dA Wycug+OqAWbEpEwK+bMEPDQqv+pKo5+gKMOX4UcNea/dcuSLmF51GPtvBmpDSZawcXrf H1lQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7P4hW/EJQx0SB73nLT2sbCGE0wsL3j486zxEtpFvLmLlbVJdzO ESms3IGlMkwXTQ==
X-Received: by 10.80.158.8 with SMTP id z8mr70009ede.50.1492806434507; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([2001:67c:208c:10:bcfb:2ccb:2315:d7d4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p47sm684504eda.67.2017.04.21.13.27.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:27:11 +0200
From: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: "bruno.decraene@orange.com" <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170421202711.oz67skxxzk6svpeh@Vurt.local>
References: <20170420154142.lacvtplusepy3qcf@hanna.meerval.net> <b57162ec-f806-6e86-7713-58608f72c468@cisco.com> <20170420160736.GB15676@puck.nether.net> <75AC1A50-3DF8-4852-8FC6-BC302B121946@cisco.com> <CAH1iCirf=ha1mrw8EUzPp34R-DF=4J+=aFyMwVn2udi1UKNifw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+wi2hMPYcwbNhHtuWKWUXb4Lg3x81p786yLqeNEHFV1okGRvg@mail.gmail.com> <dc04fe80-f844-29b1-2676-8f2bbda0ecbe@juniper.net> <28014_1492762849_58F9C0E0_28014_6541_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A31CC3773@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20170421090145.f5yuhimb4qg7knrf@Vurt.local> <CA+b+ERkw39d3E3wsceVWQAb05peEmt=qgBkYdN5j8T_5XzSZ7Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERkw39d3E3wsceVWQAb05peEmt=qgBkYdN5j8T_5XzSZ7Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306 (1.8.0)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/TUZO43REDJqpR_53dYcvpeHL1Bk>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:27:18 -0000

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:35:06AM +0200, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> 
> > Did you review Alvaro's suggested changes which prompted the third IDR
> > consultation on this topic? They are viewable here:
> >
> >     http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/jaredmauch/
> > draft-mauch-bgp-reject/blob/alvaro/draft-ietf-grow-bgp-
> > reject-06-from-5.diff.html
> >
> 
> Do we really have consensus among all authors of this document (leave alone
> rest of IETF) that it should apply to all AFI/SAFIs ?
> 
> I personnally would recommend to apply it to only 1/1 and 2/1.

This topic was discussed during the GROW meeting at IETF 97,
subsequently a follow-up action item was defined and executed upon, and
the result passed GROW Last Call

Here is one reference https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg03718.html

Kind regards,

Job