Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 16 February 2017 14:02 UTC
Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7473F1295E3; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 06:02:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4C_hgDVB7NZ2; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 06:02:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A69E1295AD; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 06:02:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13699; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1487253755; x=1488463355; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=+2zE2UBkyWErKWV28JWXbveGhyVDcCOdDS9wJfUie1c=; b=emzxe6rkpGGiBIUA3yeTNeGmOQMMRIXwTjWHzKGCgd+G0lJgvmglJZ3N FEE7C4KPJ/YDLMfNcHiWngq+G52nq+RA6+jwj2GbpDOVgxcFZarVTRb+k +qb3ghcpxiSF1+kBgHpxNm1KR2ooUGvN+VGj4ms9/0g7kvXvinoqsW1tP Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A1AQDwr6VY/5JdJa1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm9iYYEJB41akhCQB4UsggwshXYCggU/GAECAQEBAQEBAWIohHABAQEELUwQAgEIDgMDAQIkBAcyFAkIAQEEAQ0FiWwOsleLPAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFizuEdIVFBZVchiMBhm+LJ5EGkxcBHziBAFEVPYR8gUh1iSqBDQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,169,1484006400"; d="scan'208,217";a="207508944"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Feb 2017 14:02:34 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-004.cisco.com (xch-rtp-004.cisco.com [64.101.220.144]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1GE2YCW012465 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:02:34 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-004.cisco.com (64.101.220.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:02:33 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:02:33 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)
Thread-Index: AdKH5ALnHgVYM3zURr+F4Gs1EKSVZgAeUxWA
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:02:33 +0000
Message-ID: <D4CB1B17.9CA03%acee@cisco.com>
References: <00f901d287e4$16ecb2f0$44c618d0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <00f901d287e4$16ecb2f0$44c618d0$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.195]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D4CB1B179CA03aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/TVNKOMaDS_Uufkl_tX9_Lsciz4I>
Cc: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:02:42 -0000
Support as a contributor. Thanks, Acee From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>> Date: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 6:34 PM To: IDR List <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>> Cc: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com<mailto:aretana@cisco.com>>, "spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>" <spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>> Subject: [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017) This begins a 2 week IDR WG last call on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe from (2/15 to 3/1/2017) There are two implementations describe on the wiki at: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe%20 The two implementation are from Cisco IOS-XR release 6.0.2 and Cisco Nexus Switch N9000/N3000 platforms running NX-OS 7.0(3)I1(1) or greater. The authors will indicate on the list and in the wiki the following information : 1) Were these implementations separate implementations? 2) What were the results of the interoperability tests? This work is linked to the draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe work in the SPRING WG. Based on the two drafts, the WG should might consider: 1) Is there need for this work in deployments in networks/ 2) Is this technically ready for publication? 3) Does it fit with the spring informational draft? For the ease of reference the web references are below: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe/ Sue Hares
- [Idr] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-i… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-i… Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
- Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-i… Ketan Jivan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-i… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-b… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-i… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-i… Gaurav Dawra (gdawra)
- Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-i… bruno.decraene
- Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-i… Miya Kohno
- Re: [Idr] [ALU] Re: [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC … Bertrand Duvivier (bduvivie)
- Re: [Idr] [ALU] Re: [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC … Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [Idr] [spring] [ALU] Re: IDR WG 2 week WG LC … Giles Heron
- Re: [Idr] [spring] [ALU] Re: IDR WG 2 week WG LC … Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-i… Mohan Nanduri
- Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-i… John G.Scudder
- Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-i… Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
- Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-i… John G. Scudder
- Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-i… bruno.decraene
- Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-i… Susan Hares