[Idr] 答复: Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt [9/17 to 10/1/2019]

"Aijun Wang" <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> Wed, 25 September 2019 03:34 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046131200D8 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b2mU8m1ZyRqg for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m176115.mail.qiye.163.com (m176115.mail.qiye.163.com [59.111.176.115]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D001200BA for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from WangajPC (unknown [219.142.69.77]) by m176115.mail.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id 2730B661ED9; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:34:47 +0800 (CST)
From: "Aijun Wang" <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
To: "'Susan Hares'" <shares@ndzh.com>, "'idr wg'" <idr@ietf.org>
References: <016601d56d75$e3756320$aa602960$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <016601d56d75$e3756320$aa602960$@ndzh.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:34:46 +0800
Message-ID: <003f01d57352$2e3315b0$8a994110$@org.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0040_01D57395.3C5655B0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdVtdHc29FIBUpzKSseFCqrVBuGyHAF2RCVQ
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUtXWQgYFAkeWUFZVktVT01NQkJCQk9DS0lPTE5ZV1koWU FKTEtLSjdXWS1ZQUlXWQkOFx4IWUFZNTQpNjo3JCkuNz5ZBg++
X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6Ojo6Iww5MDlJAQ1WDVEVAxc4 MS0aCSNVSlVKTk1CSENJT0JJTkJPVTMWGhIXVQwaFRwaEhEOFTsPCBIVHBMOGlUUCRxVGBVFWVdZ EgtZQVlJSkJVSk9JVU1CVUxMWVdZCAFZQUpDS0xINwY+
X-HM-Tid: 0a6d667c54c49373kuws2730b661ed9
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/TamcMn4np_Xg7tVQjKltY0q_BzM>
Subject: [Idr] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIEFkb3B0aW9uOiBkcmFmdC1saS1pZHItYmdw?= =?gb2312?b?LWxzLXNyLXBvbGljeS1wYXRoLXNlZ21lbnQtMDMudHh0IGFuZCBkcmFmdC1s?= =?gb2312?b?aS1zci1wb2xpY3ktcGF0aC1zZWdtZW50LTAxLnR4dCBbOS8xNyB0byAxMC8x?= =?gb2312?b?LzIwMTld?=
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 03:34:57 -0000

Hi, All:

 

Support the adoption.  

One comments: Can these two drafts be merged into one? 

 

Most of the their contents are overlapped.  Add simply the corresponding
part for “BGP-LS  protocol extension” in
“draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt”may be more easily for future
advancing and the user reading.

 

Best Regards.

 

Aijun Wang

China Telecom

 

发件人: idr-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Susan Hares
发送时间: 2019年9月18日 0:35
收件人: 'idr wg'
主题: [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and
draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt [9/17 to 10/1/2019]

 

This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call two related drafts [9/17 to 10/1/2019]


・         draft-li-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and 

・         draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt. 

 

You can access these two drafts at the following location: 

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment/

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment/

 

The authors have pointed out that the adoption of this 

draft since the following  SR-MPLS Path Segment draft has been adopted: 

 

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-00

 

Please consider the following questions in your responses? 

 

1)      Should this SR Policy technology be included in BGP for SR-MPLS 

 

Spring has adopted the draft, but IDR can provide feedback 

to spring about putting this technology in BGP.

 

2)      Is this technology a good way to implement the required 

Features in BGP? 

 

3)      Is this technology ready for adoption? 

 

4)      Do you have any concerns about adopting this technology? 

 

 

Cheers, Susan Hares