Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-26.txt

[John Scudder <[e-mail]>]

Hi Everyone,

The authors have updated the IANA section to address AD concerns about the allocation policy. What was previously FCFS is now Expert Review, with guidance to the reviewers in line with what’s in the flow-spec-v6 draft. We’ll continue forward with this version. FYI & comment if any.

Thanks,

—John

> On Aug 12, 2020, at 4:14 AM, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing WG of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules
>        Authors         : Christoph Loibl
>                          Susan Hares
>                          Robert Raszuk
>                          Danny McPherson
>                          Martin Bacher
>        Filename        : draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-26.txt
>        Pages           : 39
>        Date            : 2020-08-12
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document defines a Border Gateway Protocol Network Layer
>   Reachability Information (BGP NLRI) encoding format that can be used
>   to distribute traffic Flow Specifications.  This allows the routing
>   system to propagate information regarding more specific components of
>   the traffic aggregate defined by an IP destination prefix.
> 
>   It also specifies BGP Extended Community encoding formats, that can
>   be used to propagate Traffic Filtering Actions along with the Flow
>   Specification NLRI.  Those Traffic Filtering Actions encode actions a
>   routing system can take if the packet matches the Flow Specification.
> 
>   Additionally, it defines two applications of that encoding format:
>   one that can be used to automate inter-domain coordination of traffic
>   filtering, such as what is required in order to mitigate
>   (distributed) denial-of-service attacks, and a second application to
>   provide traffic filtering in the context of a BGP/MPLS VPN service.
>   Other applications (e.g. centralized control of traffic in a SDN or
>   NFV context) are also possible.  Other documents may specify Flow
>   Specification extensions.
> 
>   The information is carried via BGP, thereby reusing protocol
>   algorithms, operational experience, and administrative processes such
>   as inter-provider peering agreements.
> 
>   This document obsoletes both RFC5575 and RFC7674.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Sd7Qk7pUvI8RvfeheHeRh-yknjE2mjnFko5vh81w1u6q98LqSZaNJEtwC5Q3mQ$
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-26__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Sd7Qk7pUvI8RvfeheHeRh-yknjE2mjnFko5vh81w1u6q98LqSZaNJEuzSm2Heg$
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-26__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Sd7Qk7pUvI8RvfeheHeRh-yknjE2mjnFko5vh81w1u6q98LqSZaNJEvh37pZdw$
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-26__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Sd7Qk7pUvI8RvfeheHeRh-yknjE2mjnFko5vh81w1u6q98LqSZaNJEv4ytXwXw$
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Sd7Qk7pUvI8RvfeheHeRh-yknjE2mjnFko5vh81w1u6q98LqSZaNJEumZ0FdeA$
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Sd7Qk7pUvI8RvfeheHeRh-yknjE2mjnFko5vh81w1u6q98LqSZaNJEvUqlDFmQ$