IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption for draft-scudder-idr-capabilities-registry-change-02.txt

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Thu, 20 September 2018 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E812130E50; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 02:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l5HWxpCqWPtc; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 02:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [IPv6:2001:9e0:803::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5D7C124C04; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 02:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618A64C; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:00:26 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:date:date:subject:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-type:message-id:from:from :received:received; s=mail; t=1537434024; bh=33dlbS4iiq4T2uRkw5c mXufEa2I6OXkbMdWp5fx7M2s=; b=R8K8Me/eTFxN2ZYkdD6wnBtJ7rVlUZOsKgE LwMERY7MK8uhTppvVke/KhSN9Hc3iZI1g5Fp6WfyAgouXU9xopZ9NfAG7BFCh9JS O4oebN4+u+CybdQq5l3s/B7e1Oa4PquCjDUc9av7+7u3326RuyqoHWadCinofQH/ pEqCPkb0=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id L4aD6pGLUHyZ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:00:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.44] (unknown [46.44.175.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20D714B; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:00:24 +0200 (CEST)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Message-Id: <758CA8D7-EA4A-4624-951C-9785BADC5814@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_42718EAE-1ECA-45E7-BCF3-E09109BCDDFF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:00:18 +0200
In-Reply-To: <2AF2B21A-933B-4F78-84C7-0EB6CC1534E5@juniper.net>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
References: <2AF2B21A-933B-4F78-84C7-0EB6CC1534E5@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/U9XX00SVVpQmd7Y3_YngjW94mDk>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Requesting WG adoption for draft-scudder-idr-capabilities-registry-change-02.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:00:32 -0000

Hi,

> People with sharp memories may recall that in 2015 I proposed we revise the BGP Capabilities registry to provide a good-sized FCFS space. I think our experience shows this works fine in practice and makes it easier for implementors to get code points in a timely fashion, helping prevent conflicts. I wrote a draft at that time but failed to follow it up. I've revised the draft and would like to propose it as a WG item.

I think this should be adopted as a WG item.

Cheers,
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email