IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions-03.txt - 2 week WG adoption call

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 18 April 2019 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D66120345 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 07:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2j5Tu8gouspw for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 07:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4036E1200DF for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 07:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.176.248.72;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:24:47 -0400
Message-ID: <015501d4f5f2$7a72ed70$6f58c850$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0156_01D4F5D0.F3614D70"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdT18PKNf1StrQ3RRRaQiBRQFVL9Lw==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 190418-0, 04/18/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/UGNWHNuTx94A_RGofZvLbzzS6Lk>
Subject: [Idr] draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions-03.txt - 2 week WG adoption call
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:24:53 -0000

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for
draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions-03.txt.  You can access the document at:


 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions/

 

During your comments, please consider the following:

 

1)      Does adding the announcement of seamless S-BFD descriptors via BGP
LS address family benefit network provisioning?  

2)      Is it important to keep the same BGP-ls information in OSPF, IS-IS,
and BGP regarding S-BFD discriminators? 

3)      Is this document mature enough for WG Adoption? 

4)      Are there any issues that the WG should consider to help quicken the
pace of the adoption? 

5)      Do you know of planned implementations?  If so, should is this
document mature enough to receive early allocation for the BGP-LS code
points. 

 

Remember that raising issues regarding document during WG adoption will help
us speed this BGP-LS WG document toward WG LC. 

 

Cheerily, Susan Hares

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email