IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Thoughts on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hares-idr-bgp-registries-01.txt

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Tue, 14 March 2017 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0851314FA for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LSCXfTnI4YWF for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC4A129B0D for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 39DAA1E33B; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:03:06 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:03:05 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: Eric C Rosen <erosen@juniper.net>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170314210305.GF12864@pfrc.org>
References: <048701d29cd9$15204b80$3f60e280$@olddog.co.uk> <022201d29ce6$ffb2ba40$ff182ec0$@ndzh.com> <c369a60a-3ccc-bf7d-dd29-d289d7a6b67e@juniper.net> <CA+b+ERkZmsd3DbS54pcQtLH3j+vbg+ViVtOJmteqgwQHYTacgQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170314204414.GE12864@pfrc.org> <CA+b+ERkgc+XDHQa75V+pPs_uPyPn0jus=ozkQ7Gjs74t3i-_rQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERkgc+XDHQa75V+pPs_uPyPn0jus=ozkQ7Gjs74t3i-_rQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/USf7kyR4RYUWTB2M8KZJP1JWMAI>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Thoughts on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hares-idr-bgp-registries-01.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:56:57 -0000

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 09:48:10PM +0100, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> It's not that IANA is slow ... it's the process that get's you to IANA is a
> bottleneck.
> 
> Can anyone submits a draft to IANA to get code point without any IETF
> sponsorship ?

FCFS is FCFS. 

If you wanted to submit a draft-raszuk-waste-extcomm-code-point, you could
likely prove this, but I suspect IANA wouldn't be happy and would at least
press you "um, this doesn't look like it's going to be around long...."

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email