Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sat, 01 December 2012 01:49 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94EB21F884F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 17:49:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.525
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.525 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.074, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w+wBtUqzmzuo for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 17:49:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3484321F8AA0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 17:49:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1TecCe-0000QG-5R; Sat, 01 Dec 2012 01:49:12 +0000
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 10:49:11 +0900
Message-ID: <m2ehjazgmg.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <FCB6E858-F190-46AF-8BA5-F4C92F590505@tony.li>
References: <B6B72499-E9D0-4281-84EB-6CA53694866E@juniper.net> <D704E7E3-3A95-4696-9757-9E17605E670C@tony.li> <378E396E-3F4B-4ACC-83D1-C4931524FECD@puck.nether.net> <CA+b+ERneavhy1gzKRSnCfN+YjYcU0+3WgBg6f68gq=tpx8yV5g@mail.gmail.com> <1AC79BDA-C088-47B4-888D-4B0428FB7C4F@puck.nether.net> <B549F708-0D5E-4B22-AC91-B6CE61B258FE@tony.li> <CAL9jLaZdX_jem0JdSGHzuhc3GDZXMDR0kvMKq5xr3D-EWYbNVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=rL6WAMuu5cJUQk94ObUrhKKgmiNuxRhMGJbavCg6S3A@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaa27PZwa+fj_okSHTjjnxQeR8q67Nb5V0aYKOBbqcHtjQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERnBAOU5sbtjnPcfzmw2ieu7UPEXWbGCpsY=5hcfSUToFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLab4WZa-QA2pwhD7cuCk8iNca3xSUeJkQDxJyy4dS37WSg@mail.gmail.com> <9DCD1872-F11D-4B08-9B0B-834C05D7D0FF@tony.li> <m2pq2uzl2i.wl%randy@psg.com> <FCB6E858-F190-46AF-8BA5-F4C92F590505@tony.li>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 01:49:20 -0000

> the data center community has, for better or worse, decided that BGP
> is their protocol of choice.  Frankly, I find it mildly nauseating,
> but it's very clear that they are going to use BGP regardless of what
> you and I say.

agreed

but this is not what is in the ID or was not the discussion (that i
remember, with large caveats on my memory).  it has been about hiding
isp customers behind private asns, which we know how to do already.

while nauseating, this is a more compelling argument.  and i note that
it does not have the merger problem the isp model has.  or, more
precisely, when it has the merger problem, it falls only on the fools
who made it.

update the draft to make these arguments, i will support it, and i
suspect other dissidents will as well.

randy