IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Sun, 02 December 2012 07:53 UTC

Return-Path: <tony.li@tony.li>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883E821F8EB4 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Dec 2012 23:53:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u+-FOlQv43wU for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Dec 2012 23:53:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe2d:43:76:96:30:16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB3321F8EAE for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Dec 2012 23:53:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.43]) by qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id WXs81k0040vp7WLA1XtBAx; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 07:53:11 +0000
Received: from sjc-vpn3-709.cisco.com ([128.107.239.233]) by omta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id WXqz1k00C52qHCY8RXr2W1; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 07:51:08 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <m2ip8kx6qf.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 23:50:59 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B58F0280-F481-4A36-A586-89EDB2732685@tony.li>
References: <B6B72499-E9D0-4281-84EB-6CA53694866E@juniper.net> <D704E7E3-3A95-4696-9757-9E17605E670C@tony.li> <378E396E-3F4B-4ACC-83D1-C4931524FECD@puck.nether.net> <CA+b+ERneavhy1gzKRSnCfN+YjYcU0+3WgBg6f68gq=tpx8yV5g@mail.gmail.com> <1AC79BDA-C088-47B4-888D-4B0428FB7C4F@puck.nether.net> <B549F708-0D5E-4B22-AC91-B6CE61B258FE@tony.li> <CAL9jLaZdX_jem0JdSGHzuhc3GDZXMDR0kvMKq5xr3D-EWYbNVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=rL6WAMuu5cJUQk94ObUrhKKgmiNuxRhMGJbavCg6S3A@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaa27PZwa+fj_okSHTjjnxQeR8q67Nb5V0aYKOBbqcHtjQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERnBAOU5sbtjnPcfzmw2ieu7UPEXWbGCpsY=5hcfSUToFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLab4WZa-QA2pwhD7cuCk8iNca3xSUeJkQDxJyy4dS37WSg@mail.gmail.com> <9DCD1872-F11D-4B08-9B0B-834C05D7D0FF@tony.li> <651A9A70-3BCF-40D7-A9A4-2B276E347AB2@apnic.net> <3F381069-9389-4F83-8AB4-AD819C18EDF1@tony.li> <m2ip8kx6qf.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1354434791; bh=o2+lN1+SOgusa1c8qgC30Ozl0EsQpdkG312atgfbCpo=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=pjU7Gcvc0wkpHgfwfGbyK2DRjOzTEB169wQ5D+k2+Y06GrUWMTrExU0+2ggdrCrKs NSL3HbQsQyWT4T5X+6nvCnwCH7jqFBgeceLutTWn6NL5OKvOnrqGRuOEsyYsxWS/1Q XLuKd8XLfcVFMvqCnPye3FYK5LMrQMQOEooCh1kOTKt1+w7khsdhFiBRLZF2ze5fQW CBz/++nCPNwffBJIiZfPG1l6Wq3wQPwLcRrWOBHdvDJSZBf6nP56P7OkFo9aawq/8l 02M2qRPYdmk+a6mnDNDYC3Ak/vakQZSxg26yakqanT3ac1X0IhpxXAkbQFsEv8i/AA YipqDQyYpIVBg==
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 07:53:11 -0000

> thank you senator mccarthy


Aren't we above name calling?


> if your large isp and datacenter customers want something, then they can
> speak for themselves.  i try not to speak for cisco.


I wish they would too, but the fact of the matter is that not all of the operational folks attend or participate in IETF.  As you well know, many of the former participants pulled out long ago as a cost saving measure and they ask their vendors to step up in their stead.  

I'm trying to be reasonable here and share my perspective.  If you choose to disagree, that's fine, but let's stop with the bickering and agree to disagree.

Tony

p.s.  cisco is dead, long long ago. I try not to speak for/to/with/at/in/onto/near Cisco either.

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status