Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard

Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Mon, 24 April 2017 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8316212946C for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 12:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n0bi2GGvpGoI for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 12:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x229.google.com (mail-qk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFD77131932 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 12:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id u75so28937635qka.3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 12:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=QnWj+ggAAkgKOlmk7HaRWc4RgZVEXmeJaLun781Itto=; b=BiwqRJIYNiTnnuKmS+UwB0OtU5VyH0pYKRJzr5nAHBmDxuoOX7U43hd13FiIMNZ2o/ FrFHbsIQylsD9FjtW2fR3vekWvxk8fn9TzsyDI2WhDfcwPPrhg97k5a561BZ2od3N23t DxrTkzcsjpOIkU98niaoULynSD4RoX8Lg5LSNCZFBpM3DFdDZWDBtyvvqY++9tBS2eXC Dz9/DqqbV8Gbb3FXGOnqQRlPGk0JrxZixXnFymMLKtsQxOhnpsMzrCK+5pzEA2qpL7Um 4ler/SiUjMhl8RarzsyuJaWWcG4grWUy6rJkmRPFG5AK8u8Ti7yMiaPd51BbMdiBLwEb 3Acg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QnWj+ggAAkgKOlmk7HaRWc4RgZVEXmeJaLun781Itto=; b=EqRW6/Xkvz42pwafxnNkAMNhmym9h6wD93GkFq4Epu8eNvdjQW/Yv6p/odEg7RT2s8 dLRWQ5YUrW2D94mP6EDJgjeg9xkud1sac8HRD9aLvY3L8NpvmNQcCo8o5mv676L0i3J1 7HJcVWNOWCbAJL3jjR9T6ovH8lEW6PG2DhQ2MyywsSVp4i/kd+OBELoSxW3zEi4w216o zmiO/chV4qMQ8EhjXSTLfaUA+CY8vm0KM/vnXrOVvuJRpqYTE7Op62Ag7T+it7X+Ce2i siLsoZABuGNnQRx3zL/y7BpD+g+RCal+nSH+B8uqtMYiY834g31ANLbIRNRDOTP51O88 CFTw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6dgXcMX4MazudwJgQjGznW85rKbC9pb5wg45B7Sc1ISy8N6hmC ukL6fMglmSjsZ2DG1lfI8/Z+IiJ+cA==
X-Received: by 10.55.19.205 with SMTP id 74mr24820674qkt.220.1493060483865; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 12:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.93.5 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 12:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8a242116-e17b-9c3f-00d4-a2e606a0c5b4@cisco.com>
References: <D4E812E8-AA7B-4EA2-A0AC-034AA8922306@juniper.net> <abe393d3-d1e4-7841-4620-38dab751765b@cisco.com> <CA+b+ERnRz8BEO3mb1fnsDPoiL6Wxjdfw9vQPbyODNEa+xCJdnw@mail.gmail.com> <D51D67E4.A9782%acee@cisco.com> <AF07526F-F08B-4084-937B-A9A2D2DD2813@juniper.net> <2b8a94bb-4f40-6c1d-05ff-9cf11ad93646@cisco.com> <CAH1iCirFhb3HuREBDuuDbC-fuiinSFW6UuSk61MrEj9GEaHtsw@mail.gmail.com> <8a242116-e17b-9c3f-00d4-a2e606a0c5b4@cisco.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:01:22 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: utnvw_BMdrmUKc_mp2d6BCBDPng
Message-ID: <CAL9jLaZ3RQ_Lw=e_5Y80Bg2VXxM08bKA-bgAW5AhFKz1V0--0g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Enke Chen <enkechen@cisco.com>
Cc: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>, Hares Susan <shares@ndzh.com>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140177ac4fb1b054dee3b7c
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/VI11mf37wzwe-F7oT0QeUT8NYps>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 19:01:32 -0000

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Enke Chen <enkechen@cisco.com>; wrote:

> Assume in the new code the default behavior is changed to drop updates from
> a neighbor without an inbound policy.  Then as soon as the new software
> is deployed on that router, the updates from the provider would be dropped
> without any config changes.
>

surely people test said code before updating... if they don't then 'there
be dragons' suffices for any upgrade they perform.