Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-heitz-idr-wklc-02 (3/9 to 3/23)

["Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <[e-mail]>]

1. It is small, not huge as explained in the draft.
2. It got updated and I missed it when I updated my draft. Thanks for catching it.
3. I don't understand your question. Can you expand?

Regards,
Jakob.

From: Aijun Wang <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 11:16 PM
To: Jakob Heitz (jheitz) <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-heitz-idr-wklc-02 (3/9 to 3/23)

Hi, Jakob:

More questions for your draft:

1.     Do we need to reserve such huge range(4093640704 (0xF4000000) to 4160749567 (0xF7FFFFFF) as you described in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-heitz-idr-wklc-02#section-6 for the countable well-known large communities?

2.     There is some inaccurate description for the current reserved AS number space in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-heitz-idr-wklc-02#section-4.  You can check it at https://www.iana.org/assignments/as-numbers/as-numbers.xhtml. The unallocated AS range is 401309-4199999999, not at described in your draft “The range of AS numbers currently unallocated by IANA is 399,261 to 4,199,999,999.”

3.     What’s the necessary to group such WKLC via the WKLC ID?

Best Regards

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

From: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> On Behalf Of Aijun Wang
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 9:38 PM
To: Jakob Heitz (jheitz) <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-heitz-idr-wklc-02 (3/9 to 3/23)

Yes, if we reserve some 4-bytes AS range, then your concerns will not happen.
The well-known large community need just be allocated from this reserved range. That’s all.
Do we need other definitions in your draft then?
Aijun Wang
China Telecom

On Mar 10, 2021, at 21:18, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:

Consider if there is a real AS that uses 4,093,640,704 as its ASN.
And if this AS were to send a large community of its own.
It would put its ASN into the Global Administrator field of the LC.
This ASN is 11110100000000000000000000000000 in binary.
Then another AS sends a WKLC with WKLC ID 0, Transitivity 0 and Data 1 = 0.
This has the same bit pattern.
To avoid the clash, we need to reserve the ASNs that would clash.

Regards,
Jakob.

From: Aijun Wang <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 12:11 AM
To: Jakob Heitz (jheitz) <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; 'Susan Hares' <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-heitz-idr-wklc-02 (3/9 to 3/23)

And, what the reason to assign the “111101”value in the first 6bit your encoding? It is not conformed to general definition of large community, in which the first 4-bytes is to identify the Global Administrator.