IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] IPR and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04.txt (11/1 to 11/16)

Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Mon, 02 November 2020 02:19 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBAC53A0C37 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 18:19:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.224
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.224 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.275, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HJqCv1wxuLu5 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 18:19:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 669913A0C36 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 18:19:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.107.115.222;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 21:19:26 -0500
Message-ID: <03d401d6b0be$96cde8c0$c469ba40$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_03D5_01D6B094.ADF87D00"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdawvMBaghCOE6fURXKxuh9t+EnUOw==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 201101-6, 11/01/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/V_tliBP42qPRGBZ9QQnYce_WS88>
Subject: [Idr] IPR and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04.txt (11/1 to 11/16)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 02:19:33 -0000

This begins a 2 week WG LC for  draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04.txt 

(11/1 to 11/16).   

 

The authors should send their IPR statements by Tuesday (11/3)

or this WG LC will be extended 1 extra week. 

 

You can access the draft at: 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo/

 

This draft is also needed to match BGP work to LSR specification 

for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-13.txt (at IESG). 

 

There are 2 Cisco implementations of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo. 

Details on the implementations are at:

https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo%20implem
entations

 

WG members should consider in their response: 

 

a) Are there technical issues with the flexible algorithm technology? 

b) Is this draft ready for publication? 

c) Will this technology aid LSR deployments? 

d) Are you concerned about the 2 implementations coming 

only from Cisco? 

 

If you know of any other planned implementations, please send 

Chairs this information or respond to this email to inform the WG. 

 

Cheers, Susan Hares

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status