From nobody Sun Nov 1 18:19:34 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBAC53A0C37 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 18:19:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.224 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.224 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.275, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HJqCv1wxuLu5 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 18:19:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 669913A0C36 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 18:19:31 -0800 (PST) X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.107.115.222; From: "Susan Hares" To: Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2020 21:19:26 -0500 Message-ID: <03d401d6b0be$96cde8c0$c469ba40$@ndzh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_03D5_01D6B094.ADF87D00" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdawvMBaghCOE6fURXKxuh9t+EnUOw== Content-Language: en-us X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 201101-6, 11/01/2020), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com Archived-At: Subject: [Idr] IPR and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04.txt (11/1 to 11/16) X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 02:19:33 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_03D5_01D6B094.ADF87D00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This begins a 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04.txt (11/1 to 11/16). The authors should send their IPR statements by Tuesday (11/3) or this WG LC will be extended 1 extra week. You can access the draft at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo/ This draft is also needed to match BGP work to LSR specification for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-13.txt (at IESG). There are 2 Cisco implementations of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo. Details on the implementations are at: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo%20implem entations WG members should consider in their response: a) Are there technical issues with the flexible algorithm technology? b) Is this draft ready for publication? c) Will this technology aid LSR deployments? d) Are you concerned about the 2 implementations coming only from Cisco? If you know of any other planned implementations, please send Chairs this information or respond to this email to inform the WG. Cheers, Susan Hares ------=_NextPart_000_03D5_01D6B094.ADF87D00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This = begins a 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04.txt =

(11/1 to 11/16). =

The authors should send their IPR statements by = Tuesday (11/3)

or this WG LC will be = extended 1 extra week.

You can = access the draft at:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo/

This draft is also needed to match BGP work to LSR = specification

for = draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-13.txt (at IESG).

There are 2 = Cisco implementations of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo. =

Details on the implementations are = at:

https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-= bgp-ls-flex-algo%20implementations

WG members = should consider in their response:

a) Are there = technical issues with the flexible algorithm technology? =

b) Is this draft ready for = publication?

c) Will this technology = aid LSR deployments?

d) Are you = concerned about the 2 implementations coming

only from Cisco?

If you know = of any other planned implementations, please send

Chairs this information or respond to this email to = inform the WG.

Cheers, = Susan Hares

------=_NextPart_000_03D5_01D6B094.ADF87D00--