[Idr] Autodiscovery
Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 21 November 2019 09:49 UTC
Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7763D120A93 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 01:49:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ruU5KtAKQgPw for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 01:49:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf35.google.com (mail-qv1-xf35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F6C3120AE5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 01:49:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf35.google.com with SMTP id y18so1143611qve.2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 01:49:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Lo28RabI+dNpsiEOfdq5AqJ12rbyaHMMEZ9xu2a/qU0=; b=PwsVNwWrZ/XTrASm4jm0T+3nw1D6rEeVeQpu86gYEdYiRYmhaSZiRD1S4OURV2l5cN yF0HUmAWBjUPDQtK44qT/iDY6Hrl8YArnrf4rJrccjChkXlwJKyFCtMeYLrYcBk7gns7 HSKAonNThlW1gGbWtqkMtAOQAw28B6ymMcgYiCBWD4TbkBrbO9wA2+veN32VZE5+h8cr ZRHlQZCE4iGamdzStXxm6DngBpNHgJ/qW/fYP2psJJKf04P0rMNsVD7p0A3cz2WlRId/ UDcG/NnySsV+F8JuuQ6sth1aFoMlOfBOxdIYyZcWc2j1hRM+Mn04Y6dTFTpBi5fBuhkn yM1w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Lo28RabI+dNpsiEOfdq5AqJ12rbyaHMMEZ9xu2a/qU0=; b=VZgxqnzWw/jC6D4drzNNAnIZaGT7ufhKG2GczRsuCA/qKA0l2R3T3TLUDTgCXdTC3q 3AANsoyTfcog81gG0La28lKO+TVOFtchGRhnywI1VUizlXVpfmn+A+mKlqu29hp+8UGP F9a5Fq2xlqfTHpJ0ZtQO63nBKDBUVcUg7k2oWT5yQoWzHUfG7Rx0hrx2KUtM6JHAKAzi PqOgi1FD/1976Xlzuxk+S8u66U/gnQZ95RzQDV4Expsaox0jBxo1c212wq+o284r9OYe CP6Y92TZb0jS/qe9gAjM2UcE1xzMS1C0kaZTtS2GGriyQOdilKrI1htxKqzn6fjIRlYs TmXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVEy8vGzGVWbU71RUhMtz6qfzpyEKQwcvjWgfDYY8Tf6y8RDYgM oK4g/aQ+hYynTI8H8iiKQi1vX/rogHz+7VtfyGAxLatZH7U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw/93oUKcfBI0dh++1m7NbBhvGb9qiKflMYARagRL5Dul6wPtqJJiM8tQMuGfT/2TQYq2e6TELGUr+2NiCxmsQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:baad:: with SMTP id x45mr7116425qvf.230.1574329792529; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 01:49:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:49:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMFSBxfXDTM4Ub=czHueJ28yKfQfjKkQgHQKJj6tp0MKdw@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000b1f930597d8383a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/VaBUPtL7MLX54M-bZRC41R92tRE>
Subject: [Idr] Autodiscovery
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:49:58 -0000
Hi John, In the summary of your autodiscovery topic you seems to be putting all autodiscovery proposals into one basket. However to the best of my understanding of this topic most proposals are about discovery in the DC space. There is one though which started many years before Acee's proposal which aims at WAN iBGP and now also eBGP autodiscovery. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raszuk-idr-bgp-auto-discovery-05 Are we skipping it as not important one ? Or are we agree to treat it as separate enough use case that we could grant its right to proceed independent from other sort of p2p session establishment proposals ? Would that be also part of this design team discussions or not ? Please kindly clarify. Thank you, Robert.
- [Idr] Autodiscovery Robert Raszuk