IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Feedback on 5575-bis

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Fri, 05 October 2018 11:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB01130DF3 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 04:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ByYXOfGOH4ri for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 04:50:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664C7130DFA for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 04:50:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dresden.attlocal.net (99-59-193-67.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.59.193.67]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4FAF1E4BD; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 07:49:51 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <06EA9BDF-14C4-494B-AB5C-8C5264A10317@tix.at>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 07:50:22 -0400
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D9DB6D95-302D-4101-93B9-2B93A3D5683D@pfrc.org>
References: <20180712185855.GQ12853@pfrc.org> <46D2DE8D-F552-444B-82C8-46DF301B1D10@tix.at> <20181004162737.GD17157@pfrc.org> <06EA9BDF-14C4-494B-AB5C-8C5264A10317@tix.at>
To: Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Vm_Ze-61vEw6IWVRvPiWwiczK-g>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Feedback on 5575-bis
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 11:50:27 -0000

Christoph,

[Summary elided]

You captured the critical points. Thanks.

> On Oct 5, 2018, at 5:11 AM, Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at> wrote:
> I will upload a new version repairing the minor issues you pointed out (see the previous Email in this thread -  if I see no objections on the list). At the same time I am not changing any of the other aspects (discussed in this Email) until we have a rough idea where we are heading for.

This is all I would ask for.  I don't expect one person's input to be sufficient consensus to do the other changes.  But the point of the IETF consensus process is that substantive technical issues are enough reasons for the chairs to hold up things until they're addressed.

Perhaps this might be a topic for the interim.

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email