IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-large-community-09

heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> Fri, 02 December 2016 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <heas@shrubbery.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DA21294F6; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:17:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a05zOPQGCnCG; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:17:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0991294F4; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:17:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 7053) id 1B5717A692; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 17:17:28 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 17:17:28 +0000
From: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <20161202171728.GH3403@shrubbery.net>
References: <CE1331E4-3ECA-41D7-801F-05519778E8DA@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CE1331E4-3ECA-41D7-801F-05519778E8DA@cisco.com>
X-PGPkey: http://www.shrubbery.net/~heas/public-key.asc
X-note: live free, or die!
X-homer: i just want to have a beer while i am caring.
X-Claimation: an engineer needs a manager like a fish needs a bicycle
X-reality: only YOU can put an end to the embarrassment that is Tom Cruise
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/VpZPOnWnuCpA1QWFnq-HMydEOJs>
Cc: "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-large-community@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-large-community@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-large-community-09
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 17:17:30 -0000

Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 04:04:22AM +0000, Alvaro Retana (aretana):
> C3. In Section 6: s/Global Administrator field MAY contain any value/Global Administrator field may contain any value     That “MAY” is not normative, it is just expressing a fact.

The intent was to indicate to implementers that the field may be of any
value and therefore should not be constrained.  Is it not then normative?
or should that be expressed in another manner?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email