[Idr] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-custom-decision (4/20 to 5/4/2015)
"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Mon, 20 April 2015 19:34 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F0B1A8782 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 12:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.054
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.054 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LG-IHX1H_2f3 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 12:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (hhc-web3.hickoryhill-consulting.com [64.9.205.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F001A877C for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 12:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=222.151.138.72;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:34:19 -0400
Message-ID: <015e01d07ba1$0042bff0$00c83fd0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_015F_01D07B7F.7933B800"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdB7oHZ7MpCy+WliQDeoG6G90Nwn3A==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/WBtpx2jkTMpl4ouByJYyRIVSoEA>
Subject: [Idr] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-custom-decision (4/20 to 5/4/2015)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:34:29 -0000
This begins a 2 week WG LC for the following draft: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-custom-decision The authors should comment on the existence of IPR on the list, and the availability of implementations. A set of questions for this WG LC are: 1) Is this custom-decision useful in networks? 2) Is there any concern regarding standardization or deployment regarding this standard? 3) Do you know if interoperable implementations? If so, can you share your experience regarding the interoperability. As always, it is important to indicate "support" or "no support" for the WG LC. Sue Hares and John Scudder
- [Idr] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-custom-decision… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-custom-deci… Russ White
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-custom-deci… bruno.decraene
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-custom-deci… bruno.decraene
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-custom-deci… Eric C Rosen
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-custom-deci… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-custom-deci… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-custom-deci… bruno.decraene
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-custom-deci… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-custom-deci… bruno.decraene
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-custom-deci… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-custom-deci… bruno.decraene
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-custom-deci… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-custom-deci… bruno.decraene