IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Mon, 07 November 2016 16:35 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C30129863 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 08:35:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21k4B7DLSr6V for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 08:35:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BD2712961E for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 08:35:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id t79so188157018wmt.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 08:35:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=sl5SAs1sw7MF4lPM5gj1lilrhcMW7THhwIkHP84815s=; b=pVTSZb/JIqupdowUiOX3TVQ6CT3Wr4Nv+SCSrIs8SfQy11f4lJCVVByd36Ze2eXMDk 2E2lRaXQxb5tKnB4gei9FHArdEbM+vUvvWEfYISfmPhbFoXT57ONmyN7wCrp7p7ym4De HrliXMdUDdNKR2N1xGLzcaNT12ewi0G5YwBalvKwL+1f7sYJQm7Fv7Wny+pufibKoY/h fRUrh8L9TNqQUdTpeIN5z8oxrSvKrkhaPAql57LF/HZu2v3rvSOzz40nXL1jmOYq5dyY GT7H94+o5xv0VTWFaDvTQMaMZHnDVNRJHGKEIrZNxma3xQWOV4X4r7aan6QRyDYB1R5/ /HTg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sl5SAs1sw7MF4lPM5gj1lilrhcMW7THhwIkHP84815s=; b=lPSmBwJ/SdZNk81e7ctXJwAK9vcL+QlN/2RnP4Z9bCjXQuPVUXX1quFcHZhgDW4Q6f XpazMJKHdkeMPe+6QQ7m6G1ZZrQ2uzaS+fyNNhYzLbyBTYFnhGa7epSBjWOItj81K9KK JcPzE9n6FgtjNajG7QkAohzTnrNPW3mKtWPypQ1CtY43nTG7MCL8SOXA11VCEBWzc6n+ UYfzeK6Go2HAP94V994N67iwEoL+uuq8HK/luZdeYP6AnDz/2jQSJopyiGxBV7LkG0b4 qiDa8VhdrWphGuD1NrbyN64Xn5cklzi/598UwH58a10/Akx4a0kIl3uVArQ4cDTBdcAA b5lg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdtEDiUGJUIJckTxggGG+wvaXNyHZpAwThM54MSKI/SqpxBaYXp5qP8lKIInSP9q4yjMEnTDtuODmNR8Q==
X-Received: by 10.194.187.103 with SMTP id fr7mr5939072wjc.99.1478536519472; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 08:35:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.80.137.69 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 08:35:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <B245D36A-DB4D-402E-87ED-3DBF31699B2B@cisco.com>
References: <CAH1iCiq6jNtnkta0Bt952EQ9zOKSGt=_cCySsT5XuOKuHYO2nQ@mail.gmail.com> <86860386-9C2B-4BD5-B457-2A6DA5446CF3@cisco.com> <17E646EF-4633-423B-9AC4-B53D49C90632@gmail.com> <CA+b+ERk8NgT4RB9Hv_yrPRb2Gv2RVU9EjXUpdMc=mg0U7TeykQ@mail.gmail.com> <20161107121251.GT79185@Space.Net> <CA+b+ER=8U7kww=8KpOjSDh=XpK+O2LVmStLDf4KuG+FGjp3-UQ@mail.gmail.com> <B245D36A-DB4D-402E-87ED-3DBF31699B2B@cisco.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 17:35:18 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: KWi1XJ6DeOiC_M1kjyzl27BVExQ
Message-ID: <CA+b+ER=B5_7cnMhK8Ctbuu4BqHVbZn1ppc_vM04PRZmQFE40Zg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bd6bc9c07dc1a0540b89c06"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/WFqpG6bsFm4aKG5XHro29ImZj-8>
Cc: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 16:35:22 -0000

Jakob,

And if someone is inserting 5539:* it seems obvious that the intention is
> that such community should get to 5539.
>
> Not always true.
>

​I was hoping it is obvious that "someone" means "someone other then 5539"
which now makes it always true in the above.

For the reverse direction not sure if say at GROW or NANOG/RIPE there could
not be common agreement that for informational announcements associated
with given route first 4 octets of LC should be marked with well understood
by everyone value say 0xFFFFFFFE (4294967294).

Thx,
r.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email