Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4360 (4944)

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Thu, 23 February 2017 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <job@ntt.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A331129AB3 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:46:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id viPzmljiBdnD for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:46:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.dllstx09.us.to.gin.ntt.net (mail3.dllstx09.us.to.gin.ntt.net [IPv6:2001:418:3ff:5::26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F47A12940A for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:46:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail3.dllstx09.us.to.gin.ntt.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.88) (envelope-from <job@ntt.net>) id 1ch1DD-000F6K-Dj (job@us.ntt.net); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 21:46:07 +0000
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:45:08 +0100
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
To: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <20170223214508.GY89584@hanna.meerval.net>
References: <20170221064307.662DDB818AE@rfc-editor.org> <254cf63ad9f94b5697b63c36af0f6d86@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <254cf63ad9f94b5697b63c36af0f6d86@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/XBSZyhuRfUA0xrgkJnA7dxidpVA>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:50:53 -0800
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "tappan@cisco.com" <tappan@cisco.com>, "yakov@juniper.net" <yakov@juniper.net>, "shares@ndzh.com" <shares@ndzh.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4360 (4944)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 21:46:17 -0000

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 09:26:48PM +0000, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) wrote:
> Reject.
> This will waste people's time opening the errata to try to find the
> difference.  The original makes sense and looks fine.

seconded.

Only after reading Jakob's phrase "waste of time" i realised what to
look for and saw the difference. :-)

Kind regards,

Job