Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-large-community-03.txt (10/17/2016 to 10/31/2016)

David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Wed, 19 October 2016 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <farmer@umn.edu>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133D41296D5 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.731
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.731 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umn.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x6x6dwKNa5do for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta-p6.oit.umn.edu (mta-p6.oit.umn.edu [134.84.196.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5193E1296D3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mta-p6.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4AB8524 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:12:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at umn.edu
Received: from mta-p6.oit.umn.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta-p6.oit.umn.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bnNnihWZjOKE for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:12:19 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-f198.google.com (mail-qk0-f198.google.com [209.85.220.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mta-p6.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9225821B for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:12:19 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-f198.google.com with SMTP id z82so23592939qkb.7 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umn.edu; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pnfqpZjatUkyDkQCLuBCQThfgWAhlFS8U4gw6QJzUUQ=; b=D79q6duP0mojTlkxNBpyzSS8bbMvJoowQDWonmP2QTri2dz6lSMu0kWKsbYKyPjDaZ i4q/GWIQWE3pxmZzGHIuk3fTijvkEx3uLK/l2MPwVtWnqxKlE8VglVrfReyDGoQ7cVWw VgM81VmjXJdks306V4xWTpkhgxoK7cSxeOBy0bBIDwtWFq1aZfjrSgjHGxu1HvEvShmH wF5akpxj6RfPAbGTyBoLnzN9ulYnk/Q8M/fAcN+NlBdzIO0L+BchhPwUgzQvnl8oKmAI bJAv0Yx/qSfCmDMN8rY92hKm699VKJ1LcS0L83aU7u1ImMr3Sxr4Ep1E/cKg1zYwUwwt 4XGA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pnfqpZjatUkyDkQCLuBCQThfgWAhlFS8U4gw6QJzUUQ=; b=hlSi+tQ5k5gUjusoFESPD8oKvspTUFAYxgU01aY6EmvP3M9bsvq705044/jTItP75/ z8pU3Vp7fsEHDa25+JEEreBMhX76KEi39/gaqeTq2aF2Hp4om4uXwUrURSAEXdplGPZP cAZYHrYqgwt0PcW4WnFRpU1CvTuY84mnm8dm2r7mMOBdcRvnPTILq3gucmzKuxQmz3EE iOFFx+F5t6ChivgbgFMxClum5xiOkH4K4v6xq5r3dnraXksONZ5SHQNQa1oBMn7atxL3 V8hQW9s2mMHOXiqXyS+8hDcSqmXQUUL9wzaLKhUGi7nNAbJLZq0pac8erHAiKxbWkQFq talw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmtmFRS4ytVq7pA+Eu42y++zgV4aHrigO8aNX9LwTP2XSgkQBPtIf34wpDLUlr7ta8ipvVIvPOTEytH1Kva8Y8TwshqnYT9b4OdJRJZoPu3v/D+1GZ9nEjhfBnHch5VsZpSDRA2x1JnSQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.56.12 with SMTP id f12mr7409265qka.106.1476900739034; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.55.56.12 with SMTP id f12mr7409243qka.106.1476900738807; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.41.230 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <01f301d228b4$e3319ef0$a994dcd0$@ndzh.com>
References: <01f301d228b4$e3319ef0$a994dcd0$@ndzh.com>
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:12:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CAN-Dau1dx_4o4yV=ytR-mFL1noLtGLKAZE3D_9mP5xxhSM=v_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114908cae7d29a053f3bbf68
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/XFLvP9GGffI8DH8x3aDsKF3msiI>
Cc: IETF IDR WG <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-large-community-03.txt (10/17/2016 to 10/31/2016)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:12:22 -0000

I believe this is ready to go and support it's publication as-is.  However,
I believe it would be improved with the addition of something like the
following paragraph;

   While from a BGP protocol perspective it is necessary for large
communities to be
   transitive, as there are many plausible situation where large
communities need to
   be used to signal beyond a singles or even directly adjacent Autonomous
Systems.
   On other other hand, large communities are not necessarily intended to
be passed
   unimpeded across the entirety of the Internet either. Therefore,
implementations
   SHOULD provide a rich set of policy capabilities to allow operators to
decide which
   large communities are received from or propagated to peers.

Thanks.


On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>; wrote:

> This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-large-community-03.txt.
> (10/17 to 10/31).   Please comment if draft-ietf-idr-large-community-03.txt
> is ready for publication.
>
>
>
> If you have concerns with the text,  please be very specific about what is
> wrong and what needs to change.  If you have concerns about operational
> aspects, please give a complete description of the problem and why this
> draft does not solve it.
>
>
>
> This WG LC is not a place to debate whether we should have adopted this
> technology.
>
>
>
> The focus of WG LC is whether this technology has implementations (see IDR
> wiki for examples),  and whether these implementation inter-operate.  It is
> also important to consider deployment issue or problems on currently.
>
>
>
> Sue Hares and John Scudder
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
>


-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer@umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================