IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Old WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-gr-notification [was: Re: WG LC draft-ietf-idr-bgp-gr-notificatoin-02.txt - from 5/27/14 to 6/10/14]

John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> Sun, 11 December 2016 03:05 UTC

Return-Path: <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A930212943E for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 19:05:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iThzoD0bjRSD for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 19:05:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cys01nam02on0126.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.37.126]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C133E126D74 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 19:05:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=njZsQS1eyyb6j2f/d0wlfQHxzqFoyoZucvZN+eUuxx8=; b=WEE1yi1mTEV2O2vu2nDkxA+JDVdBZmaNldtVKNUSDk+Nlfq5abl2kMrc4cu4Y9DFMbdkgMjf+gShLcSiQMdGt3IbuFhx6tAipHSmu8kLfp2yQt38uHu9DGZIAddSpRIAqOuyVUUxyGV2jCBcriq7wLouX4LiqXBgcjWbcwIwi2c=
Received: from CY1PR05MB2507.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.167.10.134) by CY1PR05MB2507.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.167.10.134) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.771.4; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 03:05:28 +0000
Received: from CY1PR05MB2507.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.10.134]) by CY1PR05MB2507.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.10.134]) with mapi id 15.01.0771.011; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 03:05:26 +0000
From: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Old WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-gr-notification [was: Re: WG LC draft-ietf-idr-bgp-gr-notificatoin-02.txt - from 5/27/14 to 6/10/14]
Thread-Index: AQHSU1tsrSWzHj+8AUOoeRl/po+riw==
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 03:05:26 +0000
Message-ID: <76AD4ADF-A14F-4CD4-BF43-8DD01E60E390@juniper.net>
References: <00b901cf79cf$c4a03aa0$4de0afe0$@ndzh.com> <F5977A01-0018-432C-B829-6A7B4695A667@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <F5977A01-0018-432C-B829-6A7B4695A667@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jgs@juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [75.151.14.9]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR05MB2507; 7:bdjJgcYQ7/3WYMDRmLThslmSvcMM7r3UrSXNdJQWBDpKhPMX5A1+pam2kfvb2V/yxohNkAFxdnEG7SjlKx1amM+olgua2TOjImS/GuTm4OKmgBZqPVeS4wyGp39t1r8v+Gy6yVXyFD6z0Qlw7hvJ+XUtOhFeL4VI0B5A9BUwWnmZZbCyJwA657YitCCUuz6B9Ns0i7UigZdoGaDvmJ5mh9sMOoFQ+sjjhsJ82CdNvdIehAhOgHXgfXR3UFY/PtUv83xHGjgmaQQWM9STL04iq5ZmprvzagckgAAUnag6u22Mh79aiM4mdEYl4tk9vFYgBdP+MbiZlgpljm2FyubBxrWXLc+Ojqii+cpMeJyTw/6IUpxKkXo1DtNYsZm/PAhcgifVx4N9tZk/Og5YkoYee8s+ZE2FLRlKN4yRxz3pMyS6L32r/ej696s85N/J2DACVN9eVyIX6VS1T6FdL8eKRA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:SKI; SCL:-1SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(7916002)(39410400002)(39860400002)(39450400003)(39840400002)(39850400002)(69234005)(53754006)(51444003)(24454002)(377454003)(5423002)(189002)(199003)(6436002)(8936002)(3660700001)(83716003)(6512006)(36756003)(1941001)(229853002)(2420400007)(66066001)(6486002)(6506006)(606005)(38730400001)(122556002)(77096006)(6862003)(5660300001)(2950100002)(81166006)(81156014)(99286002)(110136003)(106356001)(10710500007)(7906003)(68736007)(3280700002)(6200100001)(8676002)(106116001)(105586002)(4326007)(2906002)(7736002)(82746002)(54356999)(92566002)(50986999)(33656002)(86362001)(189998001)(76176999)(7110500001)(2900100001)(101416001)(97736004)(15650500001)(3846002)(102836003)(230783001)(6116002)(104396002)(42262002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR05MB2507; H:CY1PR05MB2507.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a74fc765-0fe4-4ae7-a8c6-08d421728ea4
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001);SRVR:CY1PR05MB2507;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY1PR05MB25071D369AACBD41A006F1ECAA990@CY1PR05MB2507.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(138986009662008);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123560025)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(20161123555025)(6072148); SRVR:CY1PR05MB2507; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR05MB2507;
x-forefront-prvs: 0153A8321A
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_76AD4ADFA14F4CD4BF438DD01E60E390junipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Dec 2016 03:05:26.8586 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR05MB2507
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/XLKpJN2OtE3tzY_e6CbUv-ygqUg>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Old WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-gr-notification [was: Re: WG LC draft-ietf-idr-bgp-gr-notificatoin-02.txt - from 5/27/14 to 6/10/14]
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 03:05:32 -0000

By the way, I would like to encourage implementors to update the (quite dated) implementation report at https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-gr-notification%20implementations

Thanks,

--John

On Dec 10, 2016, at 2:50 PM, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net<mailto:jgs@juniper.net>> wrote:

Hi Everybody,

My mistake, the WGLC wasn't in 2015, it was in 2014 and the last traffic to the thread was 2015 :-o. I think that under the circumstances we probably have to do another one, although I leave the final decision to my co-chair.

FYI the diff from the version that was originally WGLC'd to the current one is:https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-idr-bgp-gr-notification-02&url2=draft-ietf-idr-bgp-gr-notification-09<http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-idr-bgp-gr-notification-02&url2=draft-ietf-idr-bgp-gr-notification-09>. I believe this resolves all issues that were raised.

Thanks,

--John

On May 27, 2014, at 1:19 PM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>> wrote:

Working Group,

This is to begin a 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-gr-notification-02.txt which will end on 6/10/2014.  Please put within your comments:  “support” or “no-support” for WG LC.

Jeff Haas comments that the most recent changes reflect implementation experience and some word smithing.  There is also a minor clarification in the NOTIFICATION message with respect to including a data byte so the original reason for the event can be propagated.  (See sec. 3.1 in the diff.)

The abstract is below.

Sue Hares


----------

Abstract:
   The current BGP Graceful Restart mechanism limits the usage of BGP
   Graceful Restart to BGP protocol messages other than a BGP
   NOTIFICATION message.  This document defines an extension to the BGP
   Graceful Restart that permits the Graceful Restart procedures to be
   performed when the BGP speaker receives a BGP NOTIFICATION Message.
   This document also defines a new BGP NOTIFICATION Cease Error subcode
   to prevent BGP speakers supporting the extension defined in this
   document from performing a Graceful Restart.

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org<mailto:Idr@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email