Re: [Idr] Delta status (2/9/2021)

Susan Hares <> Tue, 09 February 2021 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4203A0DD4 for <>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 06:49:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.348
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.348 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D282b6MUK0c0 for <>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 06:49:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C31C3A0DCF for <>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 06:49:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=;
From: Susan Hares <>
To: "'Acee Lindem (acee)'" <>,
References: <009e01d6feed$6bc894e0$4359bea0$> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 09:49:01 -0500
Message-ID: <00c901d6fef2$b4ca35e0$1e5ea1a0$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00CA_01D6FEC8.CBF650C0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIc+YvgDp50iohoy8v4O1WX9lI6qwGinIRJqbbdFyA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 210207-2, 02/07/2021), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Delta status (2/9/2021)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 14:49:10 -0000



See message at:


Do you think other’s missed the IPR call?  I have not done the adoption call yet.  


I’ll ping Sriram and John Heasley directly as well. 





From: Idr [] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 9:32 AM
To: Susan Hares;
Subject: Re: [Idr] Delta status (2/9/2021)


Hi Sue,

See one inline.


From: Idr <> on behalf of Susan Hares <>
Date: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 9:11 AM
To: IDR List <>
Subject: [Idr] Delta status (2/9/2021)


Shepherd’s for drafts:   


1) BGP-LS group – reassigned shepherds 

    Status:  in technical review by shepherds + SR-reviewers 

    a) draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-04

      Shepherd: Susan Hares

      SR-Reviewer (completed) Wang Haibo 


  b)  <> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr-03 

        Shepherd: Keyur Patel

        Reviewer: Ron Bonica  


  c)  <> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions-03

      Shepherd: Jeff Haas 

      SR-Reviewer: (need SR-reviewer)   


  f) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04  

       Shepherd: Jie Dong

       SR-Reviewer: Shunwan Zhuang 


Reminders on WG LC/Adoptions: 


WG LC - 

1) draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-nv03-11.txt 

   Date: [2/4/2021 -2/18/2021] 

   Note: Modified WG LC (no implementations)   

   Shepherd: Susan Hares 


IPR Check: 

1)  <> draft-IETF-idr-bgp-ls-bgp-only-fabric-05

   3rd party IPR was listed against draft 


Adoption Call: 

1) draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt

   Dates: WG Adoption [2/4/2021 -2/18/2021]

   Status: all IPR statements received


2) draft-heitz-idr-wklc-01.txt 

    IPR call:  2/4/2021 to 2/11/2021 

     Missing:  K. Sriram, John Heasly

     Answered:  Brian Dickson, Jakob Heitz


While I saw the tracker state change on this draft, I don’t believe you sent the adoption call. Email yet. I did see an IPR author/contributor poll.





Early Allocations (new, Waiting on IANA) 

 1. draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04  (Flex Algorithm Exclude SRLG TLV) 


AD’s queue need revision/response from authors:

1)   <> draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-12

     Status: AD’s queue (86 days), requested SEC-DIR, OPS-DIR again 

     Issue: Author’s Need to respond to RTG-DIR early review

     Shepherd: Susan Hares 


2) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-12

     Status: Time waiting for revision [10 days] 

     Shepherd: Susan Hares