Re: [Idr] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-18: (with COMMENT)
"Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com> Thu, 16 May 2019 09:08 UTC
Return-Path: <ketant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CA5120297; Thu, 16 May 2019 02:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=DQNHBJq0; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=GY6DhLHM
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ELmEfuDDmQAQ; Thu, 16 May 2019 02:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00F4412026B; Thu, 16 May 2019 02:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3010; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1557997729; x=1559207329; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=dU5hJr8GTtdmsy3p1rNjwDIpCum6qXQlgXS/nRoERcY=; b=DQNHBJq0t05YlGpY8iVXaZFZqEsqv6AvrGfGDT2DjTi7QOvxWGn2ofW7 Uk8sJxiwzYvXO0wWUPq7WGrDaP5bWA/0HiCv04RiwQnRZiwKfusqSPFOn 1Z5SUlps6ZNBFyaeN+WflguX28ld7H6Iumo2UNcjfBtsYo8BCyt+3A140 k=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:7YxQURLpCvZF0JYz6NmcpTVXNCE6p7X5OBIU4ZM7irVIN76u5InmIFeCtKd2lFGcW4Ld5roEkOfQv636EU04qZea+DFnEtRXUgMdz8AfngguGsmAXE72MPfscwQxHd9JUxlu+HToeUU=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A1AACgJ91c/4wNJK1kGwEBAQEDAQEBBwMBAQGBUwQBAQELAYE9JCwDaVUgBAsoCoQHg0cDjnOCV36IQY1mgS4UgRADVAkBAQEMAQElCAIBAYRAAheCFCM2Bw4BAwEBBAEBAgEEbRwMhUoBAQEDARIREQwBATcBBAcEAgEIEQQBAQMCJgICAh8RFQgIAgQBDQUIGoMBgWoDDg8BAgygDgKBNYhfcYEvgnkBAQWBNgIOQYJ+DQuCDwMGgQsoAYtOF4FAP4ERRoIXNT6CGkcBAQECAYEqARIBIYMIMoImiyWCDyyZHiY5CQKCCYYhiGcEg22CFIZMjQ6MNIZYgU+MYwIEAgQFAg4BAQWBVgwlZlgRCHAVgyeCDzeDOIUUhT9yAYEojQOBIgGBIAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,476,1549929600"; d="scan'208";a="274082620"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 16 May 2019 09:08:46 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-020.cisco.com (xch-aln-020.cisco.com [173.36.7.30]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x4G98kL0023513 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 16 May 2019 09:08:46 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by XCH-ALN-020.cisco.com (173.36.7.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 16 May 2019 04:08:45 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 16 May 2019 04:08:44 -0500
Received: from NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 16 May 2019 05:08:44 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=dU5hJr8GTtdmsy3p1rNjwDIpCum6qXQlgXS/nRoERcY=; b=GY6DhLHMgiIPITLQp72R0e6YoWLdMeg64X26Xx7ng/JmgQ9sGlTn3imaJI7VvEmprc8oPXz/5eXgzWQcRSnlY9mG+nE8Xz9Z418FIdUZIQCYLLHc5m2i5aZ3GTmYh/ypoLZZVRwMF5ydp/B1laQ5q9DVuOomFTUd2mx9Ky83eos=
Received: from SN6PR11MB2845.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.93.24) by SN6PR11MB3453.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.111.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1900.16; Thu, 16 May 2019 09:08:43 +0000
Received: from SN6PR11MB2845.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3006:a080:19fa:623e]) by SN6PR11MB2845.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3006:a080:19fa:623e%6]) with mapi id 15.20.1900.010; Thu, 16 May 2019 09:08:43 +0000
From: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-18: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVCtbJjqQF2E6ZCUa9oBFLLbrkL6ZtdwOA
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 09:08:43 +0000
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB28451EDE699104E2B053942CC10A0@SN6PR11MB2845.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <155789455225.30258.10205074715394770553.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155789455225.30258.10205074715394770553.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ketant@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [72.163.220.13]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0d6e9213-c45b-4616-ccfd-08d6d9de188c
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:SN6PR11MB3453;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR11MB3453:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 3
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN6PR11MB3453B87CB2F1B7778421F156C10A0@SN6PR11MB3453.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0039C6E5C5
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(346002)(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(13464003)(51914003)(199004)(189003)(68736007)(8936002)(7696005)(2906002)(4326008)(81156014)(8676002)(81166006)(53936002)(316002)(66476007)(110136005)(53546011)(6506007)(66066001)(256004)(14454004)(102836004)(73956011)(76116006)(76176011)(66946007)(6116002)(71190400001)(71200400001)(54906003)(3846002)(14444005)(64756008)(66556008)(99286004)(52536014)(66446008)(7736002)(5660300002)(25786009)(486006)(9686003)(476003)(186003)(74316002)(55016002)(6436002)(478600001)(26005)(6246003)(229853002)(86362001)(446003)(6306002)(966005)(33656002)(305945005)(11346002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:SN6PR11MB3453; H:SN6PR11MB2845.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 7wmrEgI+LvXtKEx4oph76HJr2OOiaiMQgvjtLXw8NyrIoVi+1FFwI2EDYYkKT/cylBBKp9teH6gV7JwzxGVhmigV4y+sDJwdebyFR4rI6wnx8xTgdb3s3NbzptZQreEfG/zYBsoniku8Gy6AoAp/Ja4HpDu7l3h4AfOAnju9lPEYLu+ljz/86IK3HX3nLv2/+2pS/TnuExY9NZz0EEw49f0pb1Ksx3bAdYrwbx/Lxd7RMrnTDdetOR3l/NwwzTvxjfddPTJmvgDOKOzOCmJ+RMDTnEZI5l6Tgw5SeLxVywU0HLa/QyI0EB1lmWoGrPheGLcuHtuiBNt5hRRuk8sw11WCO8aZH6XEINiWu1VHAPMdQn1GZHMlPU7mciUpnMq6Q8OV3Qefan5gSHYQlu75PSiZg3CqX3M92J1pRwsgUd8=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0d6e9213-c45b-4616-ccfd-08d6d9de188c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 May 2019 09:08:43.5922 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR11MB3453
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.30, xch-aln-020.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-7.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/XVO8YcAY9kjw-RfbPCe0Y5C5PDU>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-18: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 09:08:58 -0000
Hi Adam, Thanks for your review. I've accepted and updated the draft for all your editorial comments below. A v19 of the draft has just been posted which includes these changes along with others that I had pending in my buffer from Alvaro's AD review and other IESG last call reviews. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-19 Thanks, Ketan -----Original Message----- From: Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sent: 15 May 2019 09:59 To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> Cc: draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe@ietf.org; Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>; aretana.ietf@gmail.com; idr-chairs@ietf.org; shares@ndzh.com; idr@ietf.org Subject: Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-18: (with COMMENT) Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-18: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the work that everyone involved has put into this document. I have only two minor editorial comments. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- §1: > This > use-case comprises of a centralized controller that learns the BGP Nit: "This use case is composed of a centralized controller..." or "This use case comprises a centralized controller..." --------------------------------------------------------------------------- §3: > his section describes the BGP-LS NLRI encodings that describe the BGP > peering and link connectivity between BGP routers. Nit: "This section..."
- [Idr] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr… Adam Roach via Datatracker
- Re: [Idr] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)