IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019)

wangzitao <wangzitao@huawei.com> Sat, 26 October 2019 07:43 UTC

Return-Path: <wangzitao@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C5312006E for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 00:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OJzXRZzPWUbF for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 00:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A681A12004C for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 00:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 102C0D277DF1F811F2DC for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 08:43:14 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEMM402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.210) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 08:43:13 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM507-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.230]) by DGGEMM402-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.210]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Sat, 26 Oct 2019 15:43:04 +0800
From: wangzitao <wangzitao@huawei.com>
To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019)
Thread-Index: AdWL0NoHtPddyIMSSoOO7PXbF9Y68w==
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 07:43:03 +0000
Message-ID: <E6BC9BBCBCACC246846FC685F9FF41EA2DB9BF87@dggemm507-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.134.142.117]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E6BC9BBCBCACC246846FC685F9FF41EA2DB9BF87dggemm507mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/XpqsnkDClMxPUt8Wy65uRm5_5EY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 07:43:20 -0000

Support +1

B.R.
-Michael

发件人: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Dongjie (Jimmy)
发送时间: 2019年10月26日 14:40
收件人: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>; 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
主题: Re: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019)

Hi,

I’ve read the latest version of this draft and think it is a good starting point for the distribution of routing policies using BGP. Thus I support the adoption of this document.

Best regards,
Jie

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 3:19 AM
To: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019)

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt
(10/14 to 10/28/2019).  You can access the draft at:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd/

In your discussion regarding this draft consider if:


1)      Passing extended policy in BGP  is useful,

2)      Passing policy in wide community atom is a technical sound mechanism,

3)      A deployment need exists for this technology.


Susan Hares
Co-chair and shepherd

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email