Re: [Idr] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-11: (with COMMENT)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Wed, 15 June 2016 15:16 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03BE12D8A7; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 08:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1PN-9JO7bsIk; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 08:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A99FF12D883; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 08:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2607; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1466003772; x=1467213372; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=r3rfAcg8xdyqy/jmxI3z3diomC0HhdtUv7LQqOZ/9KM=; b=fPnXwluU3yYyowJKhgUfW4T6rGb88Y6hrXkE77wN1JFkzURe1vxF4MPC TUqz1Pz5yHNOlUd72xygoBLJgy8g1BVtiMvlbLn5MUWNCjKZhhn/gyQCh t+HOfL5PyUCF5Yix96Bbj8mMQzTEp3k29FqzCRhNk9B0wQgiHABG1gveW A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AYAgD4b2FX/5tdJa1dgnBOgVMGrmSHA?= =?us-ascii?q?YJygg+BeYYXAoExOBQBAQEBAQEBZSeETAEBBHkQAgEIBDsHIREUEQIEAQ0FiBY?= =?us-ascii?q?DF7spDYNzAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHIYnhE2CQ4FnhXEFk0SEcTQBj?= =?us-ascii?q?C6Beo8iiAeHbAEeNoI6gTVuiQl/AQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,476,1459814400"; d="scan'208,217";a="285290378"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Jun 2016 15:16:11 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com (xch-rcd-009.cisco.com [173.37.102.19]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u5FFGBTM007905 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:16:11 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com (173.37.102.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:16:11 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:16:11 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-11: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHRxxbEEW4JkdwiT0G+NRH0/upASZ/q8+8A//+vjQA=
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:16:11 +0000
Message-ID: <D386DB26.12E3F0%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <20160615150104.20296.66089.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+b+ERkmOfVFrBp52zNg=iFVejKnsiUXhiH_D-=wRj77VOyy=g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERkmOfVFrBp52zNg=iFVejKnsiUXhiH_D-=wRj77VOyy=g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.2.160219
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.250.152]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D386DB2612E3F0aretanaciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Xr3C5RanmyFKl37zObg01sj-i-Q>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:16:14 -0000

On 6/15/16, 10:04 AM, "rraszuk@gmail.com<mailto:rraszuk@gmail.com> on behalf of Robert Raszuk" <rraszuk@gmail.com<mailto:rraszuk@gmail.com> on behalf of robert@raszuk.net<mailto:robert@raszuk.net>> wrote:

It is quite common to see IX participants having direct peerings as well as peerings via RS. All is driven by BGP policies both at the peering routers directly as well as on the RS.

Agreed.  To Benoit's point, it would be nice to clarify the meaning of the different line types in Figure 1, and not leave it up to interpretation.

Thanks!

Alvaro.