IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-02.txt

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Tue, 14 March 2017 11:14 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4164F12954B for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 04:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 669YsHcQCB9I for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 04:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 157A31279EB for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 04:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: idr@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.local (87-198-221-22.static.ptr.magnet.ie [87.198.221.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v2EBEFMg074167 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:14:16 GMT (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 87-198-221-22.static.ptr.magnet.ie [87.198.221.22] claimed to be cupcake.local
Message-ID: <58C7D087.9060107@foobar.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:14:15 +0000
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.11 (Macintosh/20170302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
References: <148924277112.2960.17904473852401253352@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2k27tzs5k.wl-randy@psg.com> <CA+b+ERmmqtUkJMtfOE9ABFHN0gNdztjOGELmirNgWRnDENrjaA@mail.gmail.com> <m2zigpxu7o.wl-randy@psg.com> <CA+b+ER=MaOqOr0A9VZ3TfgbSWgjk3eGwLKmnfr=byvOs11Ppfg@mail.gmail.com> <m2o9x4whh2.wl-randy@psg.com> <CA+b+ERnTJ4TJtgp=Jnn7k08j4dPibhB4gC69WWyQ4wDbxxr5zA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERnTJ4TJtgp=Jnn7k08j4dPibhB4gC69WWyQ4wDbxxr5zA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/XyzfRpjLhyoAUS0a6TciOfrKyJ4>
Cc: Interminable Discussion Room <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-02.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:14:20 -0000

Robert Raszuk wrote:
> Randy Bush wrote: 
>     why do folk use RS?  to offload the bgp decision process.
> 
> ​Wrong completely !

A bit less URRONG might be productive on this point.  As an operator,
I'm aware of both rationales being used in production.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email