IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-15

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Fri, 08 May 2020 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EB33A087B; Fri, 8 May 2020 07:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Su-VLH5SVIiZ; Fri, 8 May 2020 07:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16CB33A003E; Fri, 8 May 2020 07:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id s10so1919228iog.7; Fri, 08 May 2020 07:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5JLn5wkIKY3ckX3ROyyPcVCM0f5VW/VW6p0ZzhSPtxc=; b=Qo1rUrA+JGlguq72cTvU4szlEMYoCoIvFqcqWOvP7VpNcjudQhNPESh3PaVrvsNIp/ Zkq1M3pt/y5C7RDEHnZJAGwriOKOXO+FfxbHCMX9G5WuzDSRdSTrIFTGZRExH5vVWWdq g44eqaOUtb1b9+nCazazboRwoC/SFBKfDBVirScJ8Qf4cl4rBK9eb5O/biQJicHHjFNy phRsZ5cmkvavVKt5xdXKlv5wIK9nf1begrOdNZ1A2auNSDxvPMwrlKTZF4ENYJ8pHlJh bDMK0KCokqvh/3UTmAwqHjE8dNsokPdUUoJJruWd58Yeaqsbz5oETwelWamj8xnYd7pZ IwrQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5JLn5wkIKY3ckX3ROyyPcVCM0f5VW/VW6p0ZzhSPtxc=; b=fjfl7gS1lUGs6VoVuPUdHRcPO7wDq/m14fbExPvd7MPGhR2ojLmKgwOxjdv+GoAHjp b0aItNE5iazpNRuYKuVcQ5qBcG+UScT905NqEFZ7hhivGf1utaBd7Ate0PU7BaumbK1U pVOov05mF0wRq+kXvd8Tq+W3ejKWXICGNN4LvGx9BWfKSqxmreSlUVNrT5w9SlG5ms0P sJzHphY8PThkh4SjsmMORIJhLhl863wN0HVPW4jmBW9aoixuJvYXNYKa+naDcYwiN3fw qMktbR//RudxZ1hQkTlOH4j57pJ2J5L8x1BrgslDXyNMYbCGC+Cu+o7PGPP2mKJLbFw2 wyCw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubzrMySvgn67f3+BnEDuQ0p7YVVrrRJUyeGmBFyhxUDfGt325// qDrkJyJwTMo90wvnjLBqeUYjYiktfZhZCXg8ea9yJC1UhYU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKy9lrAVMhLQPyPKsPC5VKQV3HykEWfiYgI+r1tV0ZS4MzepjkZ0mcuANQDQuvReSCzhs1sp7BYunttUhAc9ww=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:1695:: with SMTP id s21mr2943469iow.40.1588947491101; Fri, 08 May 2020 07:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMMESsw09LGWWhqyJ_0=jRimUN+_UuCjaXHCdqF9zkpaxSQgVQ@mail.gmail.com> <D6F74C0F-3332-491B-B730-05613356B1BA@juniper.net> <CABNhwV3cO3T41=u9UGzvEMfL-GmX0VF8ZK2GDEp5muad1G4ZSg@mail.gmail.com> <EED059F2-8458-4707-8F6B-004819DFCE03@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <EED059F2-8458-4707-8F6B-004819DFCE03@juniper.net>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 10:18:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV2HmNLU1WcHLbVcELKQLqoz2seMDD9bSXC8LHh_odNz1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Cc: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Keyur Patel <keyur@arrcus.com>, "draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c61e3b05a523aa7b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Y05RKXxtTEVwPEPk6A92JjdgwdQ>
Subject: Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-15
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 14:18:16 -0000

Great

Thanks You

Gyan

On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 8:10 AM John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:

> Gyan,
>
> One process-ish answer as co-chair and document shepherd:
>
> On May 8, 2020, at 3:48 AM, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > So would this draft once it gets WG adoption update RFC 8365 and any
> other encapsulation types that work today without this encapsulation
> attribute.  Would that require vendor to update their code to now support
> this SAFI.
>
> WG adoption is complete, as is WGLC. The email you’re seeing now are
> replies as we (authors and shepherd) work through Alvaro’s very detailed AD
> review, preparatory to the IESG taking it up for advancement to RFC.
>
> The spec doesn’t update 8365 and so on, so I think the simple answer to
> your questions is “no”.
>
> —John
>
> --

Gyan  Mishra

Network Engineering & Technology

Verizon

Silver Spring, MD 20904

Phone: 301 502-1347

Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status