IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

"Neil J. McRae" <neil@domino.org> Wed, 12 December 2012 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <neil@domino.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800CC21E80BC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:22:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BtofVIPWHFac for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:22:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe006.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.186]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC8E21E8086 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:22:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail83-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.238) by CH1EHSOBE002.bigfish.com (10.43.70.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:22:04 +0000
Received: from mail83-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail83-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAEF2C0245; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:22:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.252.5; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:DB3PRD0310HT003.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -3
X-BigFish: PS-3(zzbb2dI98dI1432Izz1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839h944hd25hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail83-ch1: domain of domino.org designates 157.56.252.5 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.252.5; envelope-from=neil@domino.org; helo=DB3PRD0310HT003.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
Received: from mail83-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail83-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1355336520921354_25849; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:22:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1EHSMHS018.bigfish.com (snatpool2.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.236]) by mail83-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D400C440248; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:22:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3PRD0310HT003.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (157.56.252.5) by CH1EHSMHS018.bigfish.com (10.43.70.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:21:59 +0000
Received: from DB3PRD0310MB391.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.6.204]) by DB3PRD0310HT003.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.44.38]) with mapi id 14.16.0245.002; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:21:57 +0000
From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@domino.org>
To: Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
Thread-Index: AQHN0woYFGWtHywUjEujt618CpD7NpgVhRGA
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:21:56 +0000
Message-ID: <71D3C995B1A23E4783B8B5149BC5C8D617297E7B@DB3PRD0310MB391.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <20671.32202.484172.394565@oz.mt.att.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.255.44.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2F5AFDDE2B3F5548BA00E6EBFCC38CFA@eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: domino.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:22:10 -0000

+1 on this. These seems far from something that we should be encouraging.
Both Jay and Jared articulate my concerns also.

On 05/12/2012 17:00, "Jay Borkenhagen" <jayb@braeburn.org> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>My thoughts on this issue have been best expressed by Jared in his
>messages here, including the one repeated below.  Likewise, I do not
>support advancing this draft.

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status