IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt - 1 week extension [10/14 to 10/21/2019]

li zhenqiang <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com> Tue, 15 October 2019 10:20 UTC

Return-Path: <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BCD1200E9; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 03:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.115
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.115 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2=0.874, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FkcLK7YxlQOX; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 03:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from APC01-SG2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092253091.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.253.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 118EB1200DF; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 03:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=R7u5Wr4g56M6aDDgy5d2gWdLYLPYmvHNhJlqfRVGHgUPTcy8B6J571UpffomJ4GrqgJjFnOvmGi/BOjxOCIYtO6e5atpkCHSq+rs/t5/D2plOg+MGCUxkTwlCqTOp/fvs+t6zA5iwfYbxwJmoaq16KMc33mmOu/suHFS9o3Xk4zzMyp0V6giMZ011+tfHdRdrCmAm2hR61Iawe7ezDc5SOmzONbiedP2MKwPrhOIlmgiihF42cOkTY1Mw6QL4SEytZJqemhlaLq4DlvhLJz8ckQhP0hahHV5zQRAtbfNjNh4ng9niCPUY7eyG8VD6y1ALoXTu/fM9b6crXaiaP8lHA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=m1bS3tIZ21KaoavdBguvCMFyqFBV/IhGDySqvRUwGag=; b=lBfg+WhUiBoz6Uju++e8gLoWc/O1ytXRUq7Uf6GHoAH0bLAm9s2Zo/SjlhXS7D9qmAcGDErjvJ7/+ekEUCnJLt2kaPj13sVip+adyuzJ0wVa8fgxjg0pTMDQ51haQfPRulkVYipp3QkzLRQFCgw0xFKlQTPw0lgEuWbJw5CSZZOERUKinxGhTKltu7l5bg4V0yycRJhqD5HXdvqeQ1NXCEfTH9/5LnheTHFZg8k2AHjvLQzxba+AuoPdI6nY4/EZMQOBNe60ER5vCYCZGVxVzZU15bDZLD0/heGCSa6qWPBBNQtPU6Z7LUHae/infzEqgTuLM/vYo81Y0RCwCBVVTg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=m1bS3tIZ21KaoavdBguvCMFyqFBV/IhGDySqvRUwGag=; b=Fz77j6F4R2DjKsNbHYa6Zo/Ggz0OmrQUs0wnmDfMwPjbWnEXao+/90BzDtDT6Dm2MWJrtQ3kMgckJ7UD8Br18NSxHpXJN/NZO+VXQRLhZrLKCYpIC8hjQVUi/D17t2DUZM/5VdBDKf/wUDnK1LYQTy+71W9qybhe92BpXEdXu8HRxIPQuGg/GgXyoxRA4aPw9Ypl83NMENWXz7EHMPjO38rDQ8UHxNr0zV2+bVye0a6paNb0yoMTMHdD4zhy32jEY7C8NzAg5rrfS2yxlqONG2Zt983UTP7WuGQT8pr13yps6qNzWcbTeNdECxY86PfMpADCdPVk4lfDIm2XcXYn5A==
Received: from HK2APC01FT012.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.248.55) by HK2APC01HT054.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.249.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.2347.16; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:19:55 +0000
Received: from HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.152.248.57) by HK2APC01FT012.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.248.165) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2347.16 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:19:55 +0000
Received: from HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7dba:f7ea:56a0:2b70]) by HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7dba:f7ea:56a0:2b70%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2347.023; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:19:55 +0000
From: li zhenqiang <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Re: [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt - 1 week extension [10/14 to 10/21/2019]
Thread-Index: AdWCuk3YU0jOn/ygQ1+t1TuQqTQ3YA==
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:19:55 +0000
Message-ID: <HK0PR03MB4066082FC9E943988B7C1277FC930@HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <00f901d582ba$f474a230$dd5de690$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-clientproxiedby: HK0PR01CA0027.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:1096:203:3e::15) To HK0PR03MB4066.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:203:9d::21)
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:BFB8AC1A365201C89CBE679DE23FEF68CA4ECDB251C11CBE8BA639027E321516; UpperCasedChecksum:73C4C7CC2D7B9034208DD899D3247BF43A209A7163B4263429EF6CED2FF6CA83; SizeAsReceived:7743; Count:51
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-has-attach: no
x-mailer: Foxmail 7.2.9.156[cn]
x-tmn: [ndRL2iSQRFYkXn6pp5ExqjTnBlVZjF8h]
x-microsoft-original-message-id: <20191015181957389105103@hotmail.com>
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 51
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HK2APC01HT054:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 3
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: I7GgEYKphsZDWLYmNtBiTiG/Lw4mYGaW5QvmJLuM54/IsnLOLIsRb0Dmiv5+IMLrvnKCNSpi6+kq2MbtRdQ59pMXSWVY34xQz0rPx3kcF91b90J1Vurq0EWWGk3HrmaCeeEjD3Uc3pOXztCiI51QRuv6Xkx76U/dENMKAxGIJhRFIwIl1GR3G4N+aYkWDKXhTfhPaGA+gbKLDZha9CHpKPf9Icr6pIDQiwKn+FKeclE=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_HK0PR03MB4066082FC9E943988B7C1277FC930HK0PR03MB4066apcp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7184bd9e-942b-4d69-fc5e-08d75159395b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Oct 2019 10:19:55.7810 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HK2APC01HT054
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/YGrMq4uTqwqr987-NbFe_uQvvEc>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt - 1 week extension [10/14 to 10/21/2019]
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:20:01 -0000

Support the adoption of these two drafts.

Since path segment is adopted by draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment, the SR policy and BGP-LS should be extended to accommodate it accordingly.

Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
________________________________
li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com

From: Susan Hares<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>
Date: 2019-10-15 02:12
To: 'idr wg'<mailto:idr@ietf.org>; 'SPRING WG List'<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt - 1 week extension [10/14 to 10/21/2019]
Greetings IDR and Spring WG

The WG Adoption for the two IDR drafts related to IDR received a level support below the threshold to accept this draft into the IDR WG.  There were no objection, but there was simply a low level of response.

This 1 week extension to the Adoption call is to let the members of both the IDR and SPRING WG comment on whether these drafts have matured enough to be IDR WG drafts.  On 10/21/2019, the IDR chairs will make a determination of whether either of these two drafts have enough support to be accepted.

Thank you,  Susan  Hares
IDR co-chair

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 12:35 PM
To: 'idr wg'
Subject: [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt [9/17 to 10/1/2019]

This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call two related drafts [9/17 to 10/1/2019]

·         draft-li-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and

·         draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt.

You can access these two drafts at the following location:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment/

The authors have pointed out that the adoption of this
draft since the following  SR-MPLS Path Segment draft has been adopted:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-00

Please consider the following questions in your responses?


1)      Should this SR Policy technology be included in BGP for SR-MPLS



Spring has adopted the draft, but IDR can provide feedback

to spring about putting this technology in BGP.


2)      Is this technology a good way to implement the required

Features in BGP?



3)      Is this technology ready for adoption?



4)      Do you have any concerns about adopting this technology?



Cheers, Susan Hares

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email