Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext [5/2 - 5/16/2018]

<bruno.decraene@orange.com> Thu, 09 May 2019 09:49 UTC

Return-Path: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303B6120092; Thu, 9 May 2019 02:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TnKEapKNyXh5; Thu, 9 May 2019 02:49:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orange.com (mta135.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.70.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2588120041; Thu, 9 May 2019 02:49:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr06.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.70]) by opfednr23.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4507qB0x8rz5vqF; Thu, 9 May 2019 11:49:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.20]) by opfednr06.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4507q96w4rzDq8K; Thu, 9 May 2019 11:49:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::b846:2467:1591:5d9d]) by OPEXCAUBMA1.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::f04d:ad3c:61de:a175%21]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Thu, 9 May 2019 11:49:41 +0200
From: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext@ietf.org" <draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext [5/2 - 5/16/2018]
Thread-Index: AdUA6N2Rf+SOd1UySuqIw1eSDjH8ZQFY0oTw
Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 09:49:40 +0000
Message-ID: <17127_1557395382_5CD3F7B6_17127_404_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48AB4517@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <00c901d500e8$de7722e0$9b6568a0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <00c901d500e8$de7722e0$9b6568a0$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.247]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48AB4517OPEXCAUBM43corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/YRdk49oGauTk1aOXNO_2875F75w>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext [5/2 - 5/16/2018]
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 09:49:46 -0000

Hi Sue, all

Support as co-author.

Regards,
--Bruno

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 3:14 PM
To: idr@ietf.org
Cc: draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext [5/2 - 5/16/2018]

This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext/

Please consider the following questions in commenting on the


1)      Does this draft needed support for the SRV6?

2)      Is this draft a good starting point for the BGP support for SRv6?

3)      Do you know of any technical issues regarding this draft?

If so, do these technical issues present any major problems to the technical solution?



4)      Do you know of any existing implementations or any plans for implementation?

One special note, if you mentioning technical issues regarding a draft it can be helpful to the WG.  Our goal is to provide good BGP support of the Spring BGP-LS work in a timely fashion.  The SRv6 support is key to the Spring effort - so it would be helpful to mention and get resolved any issues with this draft.

Cheerily, Sue Hares


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.