[Idr] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-20: (with COMMENT)

[Martin Duke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-20: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support Erik's DISCUSS.

Thank you for Section 1.3; it was extremely helpful to understand what this
spec is trying to accomplish.

In Sec 3.1 it says there MUST be exactly one Tunnel Egress Endpoint sub-TLV but
describes an error if there are zero sub-TLVs. In Sec 13 this is correctly
specified as anything other than 1 sub-TLV. Please update 3.1 to match.