Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-30-31-129

Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> Tue, 01 November 2016 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443811294D0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kuGAg2OvF6fG for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2421294A5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2603:3015:3603:8e00:51e0:59a6:676c:7860] (unknown [IPv6:2603:3015:3603:8e00:51e0:59a6:676c:7860]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by puck.nether.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D109540909; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 13:15:45 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERmfW0vVXgqrxqNajZhJS3aDXD6kG7xzMFjsuk4bBNLvnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 13:15:43 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0104174F-3665-429E-B007-2E7D6A5792AC@puck.nether.net>
References: <169A4C1A-302E-4FE0-841A-ADA63E812E1F@juniper.net> <20161101133240.GK1581@hanna.meerval.net> <CA+b+ERnh8MMDgCoviLDRvOxbOky=8pBtHC8Z-WCQr6xFF_ZzGQ@mail.gmail.com> <20161101141229.GK1589@hanna.meerval.net> <CA+b+ERmfW0vVXgqrxqNajZhJS3aDXD6kG7xzMFjsuk4bBNLvnQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Yc9ElFZixvxFmwoXDddzpwrp7XI>
Cc: IETF IDR Working Group <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-30-31-129
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:15:48 -0000

> On Nov 1, 2016, at 10:17 AM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
> 
> > An implementor should not be rewarded with the possibility 
> > of laziness after they squat on a codepoint.
> 
> + 
> 
> > I argue that we cannot tolerate:
> 
> Ahh got it. 
> 
> So the point of the document is punishment for early attempts to implement anything not to technically address the problem at hand. Thx for clarification ...

No, punishment is reading the IDR list.  :-)

You can look for malice and find it wherever you want, even where none is found.  Documenting known issues will help those in the future.  It may not prevent history from being repeated, but attempts to prevent repeats are valuable.

- Jared