Re: [Idr] draft minutes posted

<bruno.decraene@orange.com> Tue, 15 November 2011 07:26 UTC

Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:26:38 +0100
Message-ID: <FE8F6A65A433A744964C65B6EDFDC240029DD7C3@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <FF239DF5-D535-4342-800C-65E5B5293221@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] draft minutes posted
Thread-Index: AcyjX7r0PdAXgU99T9WwPwtdjgUhpwAAbyeA
References: <FF239DF5-D535-4342-800C-65E5B5293221@juniper.net>
From: bruno.decraene@orange.com
To: jgs@juniper.net, idr@ietf.org, enkechen@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft minutes posted
Precedence: list

>In an effort at timeliness, draft minutes of today's meeting are posted:

"Enke: I think this is best covered in GR with a few knobs or tweaks. My
suggestion since GR respin is going on to try to accommodate (some of)
these requirements in GR. That would also suggest converting this from a
solution document to a requirement document.

Bruno: That sounds fine to me as long as the requirements are met."

I'm not sure to remember what I said so this may be the correct minutes.

However, for the record, with the additional context of my slide "Why not Graceful Restart (GR)?" (slide n° 7) being displayed, I meant:
- (from the slides & previous email on IDR) I believe GR and persistence take different assumptions and hence have reasons to have different routing results. In short, are different and should be.
- now as you still feel otherwise, I'm fine with you trying to fulfill the requirements extracted from the persistent draft by using GR. I'll wait for the document and we'll have more text to discuss that point.

So to sum up, currently, Enke and I are not in agreement regarding this point. To further discuss this disagreement, it seems reasonable to me that Enke writes a document to detail his proposition.

Thanks,
Bruno
>-----Original Message-----
>From: idr-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John
>Scudder
>Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 2:28 PM
>To: idr@ietf.org List
>Subject: [Idr] draft minutes posted
>
>Folks,
>
>In an effort at timeliness, draft minutes of today's meeting are posted:
>
>http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/minutes/idr.txt
>
>They are very, very, draft -- from my edit buffer to your ears.  Feel free to
>send any comments or corrections; however you may want to wait until the chairs
>have gone one round of revision on them before spending your time on this.
>We'll update the list when they are cleaned up a little.
>
>Thanks,
>
>--John
>_______________________________________________
>Idr mailing list
>Idr@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

[Idr] draft minutes posted John Scudder
Re: [Idr] draft minutes posted Stewart Bryant
Re: [Idr] draft minutes posted bruno.decraene
Re: [Idr] draft minutes posted John Scudder