Re: [Idr] draft-cli-bgp-ext-com-registry-update: WG adoption and IPR Call and WG adoption (6/24 to 7/8)

"Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com> Tue, 30 June 2020 05:44 UTC

Return-Path: <jheitz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EB23A0B39; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 22:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=XenUKQWe; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=STLIbH5a
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YoU3KpiWFP6h; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 22:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F71D3A0B37; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 22:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8947; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1593495838; x=1594705438; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=H+ApzhB5W5KF0JD89/ssod9E/Nv6j5MVxuxxpW9PiT4=; b=XenUKQWehafTYUM5amzZJZI1tZY258EC+TsWIpHXZCoi3PnJZYu0dqrZ 0pyKGu/M8TDxkBu/sQ10sR1/PEzwCRtA1MZT4bSMnmPNLRtpV7Mdi03nV n0VRtWdGauMli5IiVmGBChEfsqQRZkmp0rCdv9TzaPfVIAXKCgxhfzYv7 k=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:kupBXBA1DTh016VsUKKGUyQJPHJ1sqjoPgMT9pssgq5PdaLm5Zn5IUjD/qw01g3PUZfbrflDjrmev6PhXDkG5pCM+DAHfYdXXhAIwcMRg0Q7AcGDBEG6SZyibyEzEMlYElMw+Xa9PBtTFNT+IVbVpy764TsbAB6qMw1zK6z8EZLTiMLi0ee09tXTbgxEiSD7b6l1KUC9rB7asY8dho4xJw==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DiAQDLz/pe/5tdJa1gGwEBAQEBAQEBBQEBARIBAQEDAwEBAUCBSoEjL1EHb1gvLAqHbQONS5NvhGuBQoEQA1ULAQEBDAEBJQgCBAEBhEcCgioCJDgTAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQYEbYVbDIVuAQEBBBILEBMBATcBDwIBCA4DBAEBJAsyHQgBAQQBDQUIDA6DBYF+TQMuAQ6jFgKBOYgTGTV0gTSDAQEBBYFGQYM6GIIOAwaBOIJniX8agUE/gVSCTT6CXAIDAYEmARIBIyuDHIItmHqLNJBUCoJciEmGKoprgnOJLZJ2kVKBZIg2lDwCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWoiZnBwFTuCaVAXAg2OHTeDOoUUhUJ0EiUCBggBAQMJfI5jAYEQAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,296,1589241600"; d="scan'208,217";a="505096237"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 30 Jun 2020 05:43:57 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05U5hvc7023556 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 05:43:57 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:43:56 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 01:43:55 -0400
Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 01:43:55 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=asaK86jkFkzBkZZ4u0idQNR8kNJxbwBBLf6my11r1w61UfJyYRw+izjL29IAIxGFcKQlwW4JsPq2KeyRPf92VKoc62OVOoTbU7SpNygeMxjkKmQg5cjvD1l/zmXgRRTGlSs0GW0tZwK3EtpW0w7Z2qBcjXFkEmeXwPr3/aRMriQKfD6gq1xQMbYOfXFmQpQoacj+ND775GbTQXhkag6lu1pzIS1ZE9bbnDy3UYzVWUKQh+M/GkiDyQbSIkVo/CSoTNIA/ie7sMxE7Q07d9GUpq/T/6bfpZYcazqXXmQ2dSU5GQmaw2VlDHn36jf3pzO+Dhrsyc0Cxs77psnzIa/dpg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=R39By0EbiWJQ07f/caZDtp35Hdq4v5zX9KVn98uDxz0=; b=cpDhHmBhB3v9aGbBjGKbu6eT/oAClRoVNQSPKVqfs77Up9CI1LE9xxjzBBAp6y/1gurLC6Zrl1Eu0iQO9rBg3IAcF+I9TkQII+dVDxTHGOxStbyMA0CMYxfei09VWXesoiBawfTEO1myyGT0IYNbp1RO1EyRRN94yfAHnWPAKJTNq5KxsFxMPqOIPIKpeN5YhzMIEAsli7JJ6PZgjmAQ+wrU6ovgnwUmbiCXSDjbq99QLneW0hnCGJsJL4isDAFjmJw2mWOeNRnBM/23mSGHPiG5vXIIFDTA67hmF97YIaRsHfpJtHYufPhHvew3becR48M3B3rVly6mAg/RWFAM1A==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=R39By0EbiWJQ07f/caZDtp35Hdq4v5zX9KVn98uDxz0=; b=STLIbH5auE+JShUylbAFg1Mn2yu7ATwsutSB62i5wsdJA2BxjrRtLD5VQ3/iOxPpFadvwjSK++HreSd2RF2/hGbGQLtz9LpLTdJ+SMgrEtDvHYsnNabnPJk0BGOvqDDD+do/HGE+rbwYYBKGStOm01MQDhz5maj6QqTdgyrMO4Y=
Received: from BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:7c::14) by BY5PR11MB4212.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:1cb::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.20; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 05:43:54 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::88ed:a443:44d:adb5]) by BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::88ed:a443:44d:adb5%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3131.027; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 05:43:54 +0000
From: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-cl-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-update@ietf.org" <draft-cl-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-update@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] draft-cli-bgp-ext-com-registry-update: WG adoption and IPR Call and WG adoption (6/24 to 7/8)
Thread-Index: AdZKjt6fvkdbRltbTAOZXPnmqDJLJQEEmCBQ
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 05:43:54 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB3207976912B16E7963A5E641C06F0@BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <00b701d64a8e$e7196160$b54c2420$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <00b701d64a8e$e7196160$b54c2420$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ndzh.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ndzh.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [76.102.46.15]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9093ca68-256e-46ff-a656-08d81cb89393
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY5PR11MB4212:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY5PR11MB4212123FC3EB0075ED5420C7C06F0@BY5PR11MB4212.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0450A714CB
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 2WeCvxbDw2IDMXDydP15VVqbAVicXRTlvnH64B/ooc2I86p2OVzrQjrE3g6xG5VpeCzwRV3FCZ23WY1PWPceqXwREf88EaDd6cuLIrs4inKgnPRgouFaGd99v2/L9ifxKdcNgQsdUgCxqyVq3lJ6UG4rspkijYselRFVbbF3vR5C3FLEeC0VxkjTnImsaOLmEqOysP3yvrLxecIwxuYq77GKwHvCyIvLxeytQKhfP6b1LgO5ynpnromMneoAGdeoh5Xqd8FET5VDwrILoFNL+OX1nMuLEF/GvlbJ5/L07+ODTGRNvNLjl9NfbpyNmUNrqW8JAOTSGMecRh6Sp6dyM0AqBXczG+UgydVFsexsAEw3JoajDPz+0AqXY8qaTjNoZpfZ9fibYfS1vBtzbaTjhQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(366004)(376002)(346002)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(2906002)(966005)(478600001)(316002)(86362001)(4326008)(110136005)(26005)(186003)(71200400001)(66476007)(66556008)(64756008)(66446008)(76116006)(66946007)(53546011)(6506007)(15650500001)(7696005)(33656002)(83380400001)(166002)(5660300002)(55016002)(9686003)(8676002)(8936002)(52536014); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: vdLOZ9fXCrIxLkNUfeS22pIaqYy3vCdBxfDgVR9h5KmI1pvJgx1gJXIwnM61t2XhMarAsbmKY1QtUWryiH3qLb+0dmDOxTeO6tqaj4oCqwXWIOmBd+FzRjx40HZBHQ9v4drd+Ohi+xPI9uA8wyp4UFmsBnuUzVePmihh92JPnY+LpuYoPb1SKZglK3c1vhicx5KaWzqQt2LCClFNN7Ol3npzC9jT3NC/apHTcoZpvlxj9fcbHTiHuywFWgWxXR3sjgcn8M/ootrAe1wurhTlKPy5YGF7cP8IdwOib00hItFmtLZWu4fNDLQKWuVaSztNlLADFeZheHKrM5d2vJ1WTAUrpFFrBhAaPBeTMmc3dyXAv8lQqnjVgMZX79UT8sXOvOhlRN9KJ0lNABz7WvahOM5IsRy3hr4p6yQAPrxgyDg9ATSEqZk6ZH6bjJsp7B8gUo0FMdv+84EE95gEYDQXwsvSUPMDEQPIyiuMTarZaWg=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BYAPR11MB3207976912B16E7963A5E641C06F0BYAPR11MB3207namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9093ca68-256e-46ff-a656-08d81cb89393
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Jun 2020 05:43:54.6753 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Vd3+zb+3IPp5OcZXYF1wahRALVgijpP/cVTqiQ6zayhesR9qKalkdSZgoXg20B2nDfg9cSoZ4Q8qG8DzVsf2Xg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY5PR11MB4212
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Z5kA_cnErUiol-GlsFH9-zSPk3U>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-cli-bgp-ext-com-registry-update: WG adoption and IPR Call and WG adoption (6/24 to 7/8)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 05:44:00 -0000

I support this draft. It's an appropriate cleanup. The cement has dried on these codes.

Regards,
Jakob.

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 6:21 PM
To: idr@ietf.org
Cc: draft-cl-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-update@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] draft-cli-bgp-ext-com-registry-update: WG adoption and IPR Call and WG adoption (6/24 to 7/8)

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for:
draft-cl-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-01.txt

You can download the draft at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cl-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-update/

This document updates several BGP Extended Community registries in
   order to replace the "Experimental Use" registration procedure in
   some entries, since their use is clearly not experimental and thus
   misleading.

This draft should be consider as part of the group of drafts that are trying to clarify and speed up the registry process.

Christoph  you should send an IPR statement regarding this draft to the IDR WG.   Since you normally prompt with your email, I am running the IPR call and WG Adoption call in parallel.

The other drafts which are in process for registry clean-up are:

1) draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-09<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change/>
      John Scudder: in RFC editor's queue
2) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry/
     Adrian Farrell: In Shepherd's queue, top of list.

These two drafts provide clean-up to the IDR capabilities and the BGP LS registry process.    This draft provides a set-up clean-up instructions for the Extended Communities registries.

Please consider if this clean-up will lessen confusion and help us streamline the process.  If you have other ideas for cleaning up the BGP registries, you are welcome to include the information on this thread.

Thank you, Sue