[Idr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-16: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Fri, 14 December 2018 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6631288BD; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 06:59:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, idr-chairs@ietf.org, shares@ndzh.com, idr@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.89.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <154479959923.30658.12390503084291103945.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 06:59:59 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/ZDS9OoSYOqpM-sEYOzqbHSd3ouk>
Subject: [Idr] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-i?= =?utf-8?q?etf-idr-te-pm-bgp-16=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 14:59:59 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-16: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I know that this doc is only pointing to [I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis] and
[RFC7471] for the definition of the respective metrics, however, there are IPPM
RFCs for each of these metrics that provide further insights on how the
calculate them correctly, e.g. rfc3393 IP Packet Delay Variation. I guess it
could have been good to provide pointers to these RFCs but it also seems that
this doc is the wrong doc of the set of three...

Also thanks for addressing the comments of the TSV-ART review (and thanks Yoshi
for the review!)!