Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-10.txt (6/4 to 6/18)(.

I support this draft and believe the specification is ready for publication.

I think the role capability for auto route leaking mitigation is very
valuable for both service providers as well as very large enterprises.

This WGLC draft along with below route leak detection of well known large
BGP communities can help tremendously in automating route leak mitigation.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-detection-mitigation-02

BGP Large Community
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8092

Speaking from the looking glass  of a tier 1 provider Verizon we could
definitely benefit from the role priority feature from the leak types
described in RFC 7908.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7908

Kind regards

Gyan

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 4:15 PM Borchert, Oliver (Fed) <oliver.borchert=
40nist.gov@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Sue,
>
> I support the publication of this draft,
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Oliver
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Oliver Borchert, Computer Scientist
>
> National Institute of Standards and Technology
>
> (Office) +1.301.975.4856
>
> (GVoice) +1.240.668.4117
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <
> shares@ndzh.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, June 4, 2020 at 5:21 PM
> *To: *"'idr@ietf. org'" <idr@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-10.txt (6/4 to
> 6/18)(.
>
>
>
> This begins a 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-10.txt
>
> From 6/4 to 6/18/2020.
>
>
>
> There are 3 implementations:   BIRD (1.76, 2.05) , FRR, and Mikrotik.
>
> The BIRD and FRR implementations interoperate.
>
> I do not have details on Mikrotik.
>
>
>
> Details on the  interoperability are on the following IDR wiki page:
>
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy
> <https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftrac.ietf.org%2Ftrac%2Fidr%2Fwiki%2Fdraft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy&data=02%7C01%7Coliver.borchert%40nist.gov%7C602b89ee1a5e435452ea08d808cd2d56%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C0%7C637269024604715725&sdata=KFcm6goZMSv0gYrLo1PJhOchzPbCTI0x1nxFIzPieJE%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> Only one  error handling issues exists on the ability of BIRD
>
> to send Role Mismatch (Open Error (2), subcode 8).
>
> Another protocol was assigned to subcode 8.
>
>
>
> Please comment on the following questions:
>
> 1) Is this specification ready for publication?
>
> 2) Are there deployments where this BGP protocol extension is valuable?
>
> 3) Do you believe the error code handling is ready for publication?
>
>
>
> The shepherd for this draft is Susan Hares.
>
> During the WG LC, the shepherd’s report will be sent.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD