IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> Wed, 12 December 2012 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6551F0CC2 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:52:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.181
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.181 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.417, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1rMv8gDayeV0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:52:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E951F0CB2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:52:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b47so740566eek.31 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:52:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=BLfzAmjbCy4/mw2f8mkXNS0WJlf1VMf/HIrYNuXYV+E=; b=ofKTrKf6qr6on/Gtibl3b3Vbvzxq+mQdoA48KFWokgLTksEXuT1Jy6q8a9Dk6Vt5YP jT43EJWy3s3VlQa5tZ2d5S3Whb4NikwpMBAdWe9QJPEBwYtsUmfTNYOuooiKoajDIN7+ x4gaa28XlKb5thx4jiZ3KaaMmr684ItwQRAhA64bCO7MX9C5pG97XxJRTAydoHlqO4J4 Ntzvhtxxzx2zqNFlxaRmPbjuaGeylOygdKx6FcAY0gNQbo7fh6BGKvwQL1O0nW6t4Ngp rE6XwDWmxWKLXwArO+BcdxOsyotXW162uK4OfNzBvIJDYkqVoJQI0YzMW1jjdoqfsx4Y OlEw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.0.71 with SMTP id 47mr5053374eea.19.1355338350525; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:52:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.173.199 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:52:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <50C8C491.4040705@foobar.org>
References: <CA+b+ERnuWZ+r2O-eFhe3hU00uoU4UKnRcbhLNVXU7p5+DjoWbQ@mail.gmail.com> <C6C16AE3B7961044B04A1BCEC6E2F93603D12A0C@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <20121210225858.GC24937@puck.nether.net> <m2d2yh32cw.wl%randy@psg.com> <CA+b+ERnSVvewSpftXs3FhW12-S+sgnB1SwD4L+xqFW+hhbQayw@mail.gmail.com> <7120600D-71BD-4E61-8F06-25B7C2BAE6A8@riw.us> <20121211185917.GA21813@puck.nether.net> <CA+b+ERnzo2BLWjE1J_dMfYuExbG9WYJroPE4ZAWg++KK2_jy1g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERm=Agr7b6JXcXOwiP4wBjnEFmnVNt5fAJrn18R0hGtSzg@mail.gmail.com> <50C78C29.3070406@foobar.org> <50C8B8D9.4090903@umn.edu> <50C8C491.4040705@foobar.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:52:30 -0500
Message-ID: <CAH1iCio8Sh_ASLAa8DOcVXa5n19LgCAnSwTQV9edn2On1KPJbw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b66f329eefcdb04d0ac4c22"
Cc: IETF IDR Working Group <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:52:34 -0000

Okay, in as-plain, here goes:

42781900[8-9]? | \
4278190[1-9]?? | \
427819[1-9]??? | \
4278[2-9]????? | \
4279?????? | \
428??????? | \
429[0-3]?????? | \
4294[0-8]????? | \
42949[0-5]???? | \
429496[0-6]??? | \
4294967[0-1]?? | \
42949672[0-8]? | \
429496729[0-4]

In fix-width, and wrapped so one-per-line, and using "hyphen" even for
consecutive digits, it lines up nicely (so you can easily verify
correctness).

Feel free to use the above (and if you like, credit me :-)).

Again, not too horrible - 13 terms instead of 5 for as-dot, or 7-8 for
current 16-bit.

Brian

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:

> On 12/12/2012 17:03, David Farmer wrote:
> > I think the proposed range is more than reasonable, 4,278,190,080 to
> > 4,294,967,294.
>
> Dave,
>
> could you please provide me with a regexp which matches exactly 4278190080
> to 4294967294?
>
> thanks,
> Nick
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status