Re: [Idr] draft-chen-bgp-redist-01.txt

[Enke Chen <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Jim:

Although the static routing is used as examples in the draft, the issues
are generic between BGP and RIB, regardless of the source/protocol of the
RIB route. The proposed solution is also generic. We will look at the draft
to see if there are places that need to be generalized.

Yes, the issues and the proposed solution are AFI/SAFI agnostic as long as
the AFI/SAFI has similar RIB interaction (i.e., route redistribution and
download) and uses the same BGP route selection algorithm.

Thanks.   -- Enke

On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 2:24 PM UTTARO, JAMES <[e-mail]> wrote:

> *Enke,*
>
>
>
> *              I understand what you are driving at in the draft but is it
> specific to local routes being redistributed and the timing of.  Can this
> be generalized to other protocol redistribution i.e. OSPF, ISIS? Can you
> describe other scenarios involving redistribution of state from IGP
> protocols? *
>
>
>
> *Would this or similar issues be possible if we are migrating from an IGP
> to a BGP LU solution and redistributing NHs. It seems that it is not
> AFI/SAFI specific..*
>
>
>
> *Thanks,*
>
> *              Jim Uttaro*
>
>
>
> *From:* Idr <[e-mail]> *On Behalf Of * Enke Chen
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 29, 2021 1:14 PM
> *To:* idr@ietf. org <[e-mail]>
> *Cc:* Jenny Yuan <[e-mail]>
> *Subject:* [Idr] draft-chen-bgp-redist-01.txt
>
>
>
> Hi, Folks:
>
>
>
> Apologies for the very long delay in updating the draft:
>
>
>
>        https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-bgp-redist/01/
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-bgp-redist/01/__;!!BhdT!1VhLEdVG26zxX8nYSU3PKvPID9l8KGPdGF-8XBNnJkjGNO6Jj4SmmzPxLng$>
>
>
>
> The issue still exists, and shows up from time to time. The revised
> version provides a complete solution that covers the use cases involving a
> single router as well as multiple routers in a network.
>
>
>
> Your review and comments are welcome.
>
>
>
> Thanks.   -- Enke
>
>
>
>
>