[Idr] Call for implementation information on drafts past WG LC

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Wed, 02 January 2019 13:48 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFF012D4EA for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 05:48:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.845
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.845 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13RW-z1FlyrL for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 05:48:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 094D6127AC2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 05:48:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.177.57.147;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 08:48:20 -0500
Message-ID: <007901d4a2a1$d31ffbb0$795ff310$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_007A_01D4A277.EA4B5340"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AdSiodJXDjCme2FnRHGuxnZYGAtwIA==
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 190102-1, 01/01/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/_QQ7WOOAk8rLvG_TPbqMl_gZ9-I>
Subject: [Idr] Call for implementation information on drafts past WG LC
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 13:48:29 -0000

Greetings for 2019:

 

The IDR chairs would like to start the new year by shipping IDR drafts past
WG LC to the IESG for publication.  We need your help with information on
implementations  on the following: 

 

.         draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria  

.         draft-ietf-idr-rtc-no-rt-10.txt

.         draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-10.txt 

.         draft-ietf-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-17.txt  

 

Here's the information we have about these drafts: 

 

.         draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria (2 cisco
implementations)   

.         draft-ietf-idr-rtc-no-rt-10.txt  (no implementations) 

.         draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-10.txt  (3 partial implementations) 

.         draft-ietf-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-17.txt  (3 full
implementations) 

 

 We have heard rumors of full implementations of the
draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-10.txt.  

 

Please send any information you have to the chairs regarding
implementations. 

 

Susan Hares