IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG adoption of draft-heitz-idr-large-community; one week to comment on early code point allocation

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Sat, 24 September 2016 13:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FE612BE6A for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 06:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gFFw34MnuMFc for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 06:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B60FB12BE66 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 06:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id l132so74944296wmf.1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 06:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=25joMJk+daKjXz5acw6zXiVzFmqxw59wgZnaSlT91Bc=; b=yCc9OsGYwt5R/xtR5pldsTgPZvXHJ8ZbNZa6BpPUEIkPKJC8/7qCEuC+WkIIxnWi3B asZpvm8boOlCHCFG8mFatHgN59R8mSKhyeO8NGzYH1433lu+4/YvGzb0RqnD8xLGvNdU xcowDF8qx3sIS74NvgNGMVdyNbVkmBv54p/UR4AZpYjSQcu1mwRWbaWlOQNF/yBzn+2s +CURKOixQPuI4A2JeE0GGR35DWCva85iNoabTPqOdszVtoKD2a/V2NW2U4r1aIHsKwGK 5kmRhUjNlAaMZVXD7AaOhwhUiN3Jv/Mgc//BP3KS8U7ODKcG6SW9o4AdLsy5W+iZeCVS 8+sQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=25joMJk+daKjXz5acw6zXiVzFmqxw59wgZnaSlT91Bc=; b=bdYIIt0Xu6gjHwADdWwZAW+/jnqGQRQNWO+zjYdXql6Blg0W55Vcp7u1l38WLXC0om PIbk/eEzyc0VCL15/zWtCHeq9SxtO61vJImBvBmA9fKw1iINgz24LPMVyzTyyBUOFGKa a9o1AZlCqFD9/O4OPlwlI43okOCWy/Mclq+rZtQAjhU9hxGDhWykKM4Y5GywShyvpUP+ ZLnJTd1iRSBlpbEAOMhB4QSQisBE98JFwgW0FcL2N+FbiJYZZFhm9nkEj25/5hiTRvcB 2NB44a5lmPSw65KbiexnsDz4bf3TGs8klpQa4vbBPBcvzKszyudOITeGvWttBhKjpHI9 GHQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rlu+BGxVLLUx5qqPLy0n2UOJI+7tZXW+5Ei293/ILDOxznn67Gt3c3HXURs9nWnzK4I4kPF484MNavdCw==
X-Received: by 10.28.151.72 with SMTP id z69mr7367946wmd.61.1474724239243; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 06:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.80.153.44 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 06:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <57E678DD.2020304@foobar.org>
References: <43B423F6-E214-402D-BB29-99C062C46363@juniper.net> <20160924092657.GE1603@Vurt.local> <57E678DD.2020304@foobar.org>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:37:18 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: MTQNAk6ZKFpulDtGT2DGMaAJdnU
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERmdy2C3Sk4bSh4eevwm2KS8ZxLfdg-daiqkWj-VQTss2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11452c106bfff9053d40fe71"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/_lnbQfyG5sPQ5vH1-xbhlNjEjRA>
Cc: I Don't Remember <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption of draft-heitz-idr-large-community; one week to comment on early code point allocation
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 13:37:22 -0000

​Nick,​


> It's taken us 20 years to reach 14 well-known communities in the rfc1997
> WKC registry.


​It is not 20 years ... the topic has been discussed via those 20 years
number of times.

The problem is that it is impossible to call something "well known" and
depend on it in any way once the RFC is issued. ​

​So IMO ​reserving the space to be filled by some other RFC in the future
makes sense.



> Extrapolating this out, this should give us enough bit
> space for all requirements for the next ~100,000 years, at which point
> I'd be happy to see the IDR working group re-opening discussion on the
> issue.
>

​That even beat's ​Pando's tree roots !

Cheers,
R.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email