Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-01.txt

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 12 October 2016 22:08 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73276129561 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wIB66VW3MsVy for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22d.google.com (mail-lf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CACEA129490 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id b81so96888750lfe.1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=30t/Lysg64HhV8MvDL1nd9oz1/YPxFW/9bUbGm7MQEI=; b=l0GqHpq60nuk+o6asXmi1vZP5L1VkYgfAQBznHKdMCB0LP9t40MCEFEfrFvEEyUrer TZYyhWseDhU9AILkAK1l7WBekRrrQM5HLQ6gD1RmVLXXzbGQesbReTR7mWB9eh8Mdq9A dVyZYehxj2t+gcZ6Q3lpjVksy3vM2bJmI5aP4/0gwPCq2Wlg0LDG60Aceg9CbiaRAWXB MGHC3wKZh/aJ4xlOvJaG1kPfPiaACXYd1EigScxD4ucqeMNPAj/gm6hAXUwQItTzRdYx w4vy9ufagXgU+2D2nYLr1ZmeI6z4GmEPnAAHo8dB1UTNHO5qwKF3XueQXIMyxOh13E3/ r9kw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=30t/Lysg64HhV8MvDL1nd9oz1/YPxFW/9bUbGm7MQEI=; b=D5wbsmOcPWkndCP1SUEpF7rk3fHP+ot3g8KL9IhB+gUyol70FRAxzhx4ZBGIgbN+Ww fgMEFEzdTaAew+WmRYTX69q5WlqqvGT7iiqKalyQFd1K86vBPAyokG4NliPF3aE4/pa6 kc/ruB/bD4S6Iqdm7vTwWjGoCIHDCIk7IZxQOEuCz6uTYMD8+/3AWj+G4t83nlIF5CJd qQyECqtQpUkkj8q6iXFRatAdQNecG+4Lqu3olZ6tt9qzQU23x4B8FsPwDTwydEwS2O8l Tp+r3VespypuCVe0HXmgWskbJYbgfGmMv5ZuApokX0lJkvMMhmFwcP3iJoopW15AVWYL MX9w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmdpVhFoLW+TxxWk8KwVJjK5+SKMvWZxGOpOi+eekOUjdjRdQ6soYT8qdp7PmRVQu26yI3fwloQ5KPKwA==
X-Received: by 10.194.178.130 with SMTP id cy2mr4327943wjc.138.1476310125919; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.80.182.155 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20161012215623.GH45879@shrubbery.net>
References: <57F92043.20301@foobar.org> <A9BBA442-361F-444F-9AFC-33FAAF5F6061@gmail.com> <00ff01d22214$a9832440$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <57FAD3EA.6070800@foobar.org> <020b01d223a1$f0e34a20$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <57FCC876.5090109@foobar.org> <52AF3F60-BC0F-44AC-89D7-8E108617162F@pfrc.org> <552160CC-1000-42B1-95E3-6F6B9E1DC2F8@gmail.com> <20161011221544.GG12806@shrubbery.net> <20161012134552.GE22695@pfrc.org> <20161012215623.GH45879@shrubbery.net>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:08:44 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: cTyNevFKqTkrvRfQnIpLMiZKXSo
Message-ID: <CA+b+ER=d3DAObhJws3k2Jvmu6XJcpv8jJAkmROqb_zCXi430aQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01419ce8a244fd053eb23cd4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/_ycCOLtlWTHGmWmyoEZT9Ph21qo>
Cc: idr <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-01.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 22:08:50 -0000

I believe Jeff was talking about intelligent cleanup with sufficient
information embedded into community itself such that forwarding BGP speaker
can decide what to pass and what to drop
... not an unconditional blind drop.

However as I see the folks here - some say do not send anything over eBGP
unless explicitely permitted (and sorry but "send-community all" knob is
not at that level of granularity needed), some say send everything
everywhere.

To me this is a bit a conflict of interests which I am really not going to
be in the middle of.

Some say that standardizing, deployment, education of large communities
will take years. And in fact they are very correct. It will take that much
indeed.

That is why I believe the delta to add few more lines of code which Jakob
refused should be smashed by IDR WG in the interest of BGP as protocol and
we should all together as a WG produce a solution which scales to the
current needs as well as leaves some room for future extensions. That would
mean that the overall effort which vastly exceeds few lines of C would gain
much more value.

Acee stating that may be even wide comms could be progressed in the future
is very interesting in the light of his BGP IOS team mate stating in the
other thread that he will never implement those :)

Kind regards,
R.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:56 PM, heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> wrote:

> Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 09:45:52AM -0400, Jeffrey Haas:
> > Arguably this was one of the motivations for doing scoping of attributes
> or
> > communities themselves: If the effective operational behavior is almost
> > always going to be AS-non-transitive, it'd be nice if the cleanup just
> > happens automagically.  Unfortunately people are rather enamored with
> their
> > existing cleanup mechanisms.
>
> Please, no automatic clean-up.  A community may be 100% legitimately used
> to affect a decision 2 or 3 AS-hops away and it is extremely useful.
> Operators already know how to alter communities.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>