[Idr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-20: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 02 December 2020 05:12 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps@ietf.org, idr-chairs@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, shares@ndzh.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Message-ID: <160688595838.15290.4590240150291886052@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 21:12:38 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/a5QopC3crHrVyuwk_pJC2CFOGKY>
Subject: [Idr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-20: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-20: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

For the new registries defined in Sections 14.6 through 14.9, it would help
both IANA and the reader if the definition specified the range of values: for
the bit fields, how many bits are available?  For the numeric field in 14.8,
what’s the valid numeric range?

[Idr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-id… Barry Leiba via Datatracker
Re: [Idr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-iet… John Scudder