Re: [Idr] IDR WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server (2/2/2015 - 2/16/2015)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 12 February 2015 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474671A1B71 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:39:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DVllOnANlKQu for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:39:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x232.google.com (mail-ig0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 694091A6FCB for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:38:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hl2so7348027igb.5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:38:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+vPl4LLsKNbNC3svyK/LnWChm5Lz6giMFIDXcje/p28=; b=hFsFaQ0+ZcCParvwuj/LE5Ro4QYvkX3kRs+zZ83y2NsDMv50/VIeSQM6gzsMl364cH oLma3O+R6+qpMg14jvBaoyhRS+Rcify9yfUNTwunabD6b4M7kEHWy5frOqMEy2TzkzD7 BTb1RFS6AF6CaKBPavyngwz3NLFN0RDjqF02aZiwTDYcHRFCqOu6MU0zWk7JavU7tYh5 9uuYAMDbrma/Cgn7WU6WzrELZA6M4bFN/9ZVncL7IuXn3OsZZ2zBoKb35a1H4hPZ3HgT 1X1jOmYkaRNztiZNpLSGhm+sZtmifRPlNYIHXtV6KcL5gwR93cNKaTCqcXrPIEN1ride SsoA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.137.17 with SMTP id l17mr7859584iod.33.1423784337613; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:38:57 -0800 (PST)
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.157.69 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:38:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m2r3tuogek.wl%randy@psg.com>
References: <D101AA78.AA0D8%david.freedman@uk.clara.net> <m2a90jst34.wl%randy@psg.com> <D102047C.AA1A1%david.freedman@uk.clara.net> <20150212075505.GC53388@shrubbery.net> <m2a90jr1n4.wl%randy@psg.com> <20150212193113.GR67810@shrubbery.net> <54DD0FFE.8070608@inex.ie> <m2386apvll.wl%randy@psg.com> <CA+b+ERk27PV+edaNN+nTwXM+1wE285Ti2dD46irfYsC2wKdb_Q@mail.gmail.com> <m2r3tuogek.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:38:57 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: FUgo-6dR0r6TcsfjCtunhSG6GXY
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERmrzT-0mn=pgRCXzWa4bx0Y27fT064nk9Hv=vOWdQ9XFw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ed0d4ae2a81050eec9f95"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/aJj2S-ifyoUN8zMKYG5igbST2Ag>
Cc: John Heasly <heas@shrubbery.net>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IDR WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server (2/2/2015 - 2/16/2015)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:39:19 -0000

Ahhh apparently I did not get it at first look .. I was sufficiently
shocked that you care about flowspec that I could not resist to respond :))

Anyhow many thx for your support for this draft !

When you came to the mic in Berlin after I presented it I was not sure if I
should run ...

Best,
Robert.


On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> > Flowspec is supported as any other AFI/SAFI by configuration. It is not
> > left out.
>
> that was sarcasm
>
> google carpenter gothic
>
> randy
>