Re: [Idr] Joel Jaeggli's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-11: (with COMMENT)

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Tue, 14 June 2016 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECECE12D80C; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ArqQ_Ijc6tmz; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E982412D09B; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: idr-chairs@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.local (089-101-195156.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.156] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u5EGqJmT007985 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:52:20 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-195156.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.156] (may be forged) claimed to be crumpet.local
Message-ID: <57603642.4000900@foobar.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:52:18 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
References: <20160614153754.19291.870.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <57602C27.10803@foobar.org> <ba3ad464-b4aa-50ef-a5b2-f48bc3ad9d92@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <ba3ad464-b4aa-50ef-a5b2-f48bc3ad9d92@bogus.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/aLR4ACuNOiiwMNdbEGEP-33eOPg>
Cc: idr@ietf.org, idr-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, shares@ndzh.com, draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] Joel Jaeggli's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:52:27 -0000

joel jaeggli wrote:
> IF L is a customer of A and B sure.

you mean, if L is a downstream of A and B - not necessarily a customer.

> If it's L's policy that's doing the blocking

This is the point - it's not L's policy that's doing the blocking.  If A
blocks L's prefixes at the RS, it will block all paths, via both A and
B, even though it should have no control over B's paths if it decides to
take itself out of the equation.

Nick