IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext [5/2 - 5/16/2018]

Zhuangshunwan <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com> Sun, 05 May 2019 02:23 UTC

Return-Path: <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256A31202F6; Sat, 4 May 2019 19:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F_kSovwZX1Gw; Sat, 4 May 2019 19:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB615120116; Sat, 4 May 2019 19:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 9405B161F18F5802767E; Sun, 5 May 2019 03:23:15 +0100 (IST)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Sun, 5 May 2019 03:23:15 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Sun, 5 May 2019 10:22:57 +0800
From: Zhuangshunwan <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext@ietf.org" <draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext [5/2 - 5/16/2018]
Thread-Index: AdUA6N2Rf+SOd1UySuqIw1eSDjH8ZQB/9SzQ
Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 02:22:56 +0000
Message-ID: <19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858E5B82C5E@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <00c901d500e8$de7722e0$9b6568a0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <00c901d500e8$de7722e0$9b6568a0$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.130.202.166]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858E5B82C5ENKGEML515MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/aPwmVUh4UeOxmxgJe0krzvavaKI>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext [5/2 - 5/16/2018]
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 02:23:21 -0000

Hi Sue/all,

Support for WG adoption. More inline.
Thanks,
Shunwan


From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2019 9:14 PM
To: idr@ietf.org
Cc: draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext [5/2 - 5/16/2018]

This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext/

Please consider the following questions in commenting on the


1)      Does this draft needed support for the SRV6?
Yes.

2)      Is this draft a good starting point for the BGP support for SRv6?
Yes.

3)      Do you know of any technical issues regarding this draft?

If so, do these technical issues present any major problems to the technical solution?

No.



4)      Do you know of any existing implementations or any plans for implementation?
Yes.

One special note, if you mentioning technical issues regarding a draft it can be helpful to the WG.  Our goal is to provide good BGP support of the Spring BGP-LS work in a timely fashion.  The SRv6 support is key to the Spring effort - so it would be helpful to mention and get resolved any issues with this draft.

Cheerily, Sue Hares

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status