IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

"Mick O'Rourke" <mkorourke@gmail.com> Sun, 02 December 2012 12:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mkorourke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14D121F8D3F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 04:14:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oUcrGEAJVp3D for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 04:14:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D029521F879D for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 04:14:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id r3so765078wey.31 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 04:14:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Jc6tytTMO/1km5Ew6/W17cEHH3jMPdHzyMtvmjHe5r4=; b=rcVuWaDM2rvUhoxHcbCsXoRMpli1T5POqkr3Gazbkr1A0QU9dvcT+RvMbk7ic2rCcc Mpb9R8+4+RwhrZl8Xuvu0WxhQ/sov5nOQnAdzzV/8S+RTduIJ4uudJ+UKqqUs1McE5lN 439vvKVTZj8yhDPmrd9prcSn4QkGe7+e+rzbQ9POzzVt5afjTfEToyTkMzmQUpRJTine vlWSut3/kJajs07Oj2z/xawSDiMtnGSHKMDSZ7Yec47RIx4RycdoB1meT20/IgF+q1Lv Ov4P5c1ky9uUk7s6J6vkt5UaP5ep4c+7oRZj3sJynwOwN0aKxlqqjGbXyG7kvMGKP8EO 8vdQ==
Received: by 10.180.88.99 with SMTP id bf3mr4807068wib.22.1354443511596; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 02:18:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.154.2 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 02:18:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <B6B72499-E9D0-4281-84EB-6CA53694866E@juniper.net>
References: <B6B72499-E9D0-4281-84EB-6CA53694866E@juniper.net>
From: Mick O'Rourke <mkorourke@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 21:18:11 +1100
Message-ID: <CAM7FjJdtEXNJ-KnJwiFEkZ4oJ-ODOv=EbY7xX0CUbShX4Fwn9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d04428eae60868704cfdbf4d9"
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 12:14:44 -0000

+1 support. A valid problem in large enterprise where eBGP is now widely in
use.

Perhaps some review of IR membership costs could allow for a better middle
ground. There is a case for non-support given the flat nature of IPv6
Internets\internets as to not seeing this draft move ahead. That said could
a large enterprise or sp for instance request at the present point in time
a block of 2000 ASNs?


On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:26 AM, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> We have received a request for a working group last call on
> draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00. A URL for the draft is
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
>
> Please send comments to the list by December 14. [*]
>
> Thanks,
>
> --John
>
> [*] Unless the world ends on December 12, in which case send them by
> December 12.
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status