Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-10.txt (6/4 to 6/18)(.

[Gyan Mishra <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 11:14 AM Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Gyan,
>
> >I support this draft and believe the specification is ready for
> publication.
>
> >I think the role capability for auto route leaking mitigation is very
> >valuable for both service providers as well as very large enterprises.
>
> Thank you.
>
> >This WGLC draft along with below route leak detection of well known large
> >BGP communities can help tremendously in automating route leak mitigation.
>
> >
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-detection-mitigation-02
>
> Appreciate the comment. We plan to request a WGLC in GROW for the above
> draft soon.
>
> >BGP Large Community
> >https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8092
>
> >Speaking from the looking glass  of a tier 1 provider Verizon we could
> >definitely benefit from the role priority feature from the leak types
> >described in RFC 7908.
>
> I think you meant '...definitely benefit from the role priority
> feature [to protect] from the leak types described in RFC 7908'.


  Gyan> Yes that is what I meant

 So the two implementations that were done and interoperability which were
the vendors?

Also if the beta code feature is available do you have any operators
testing the code?

>
>
> Great to hear that.
>
> Sriram
>
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7908
>
> >Kind regards
>
> >Gyan
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *



*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD