From nobody Thu Mar 11 04:11:59 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A101A3A1A96; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 04:11:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.95 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lPjI-x7jgWZc; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 04:11:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30EE53A1A95; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 04:11:52 -0800 (PST) X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.107.94.230; From: "Susan Hares" To: , Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 07:11:30 -0500 Message-ID: <006e01d7166f$b257d300$17077900$@ndzh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_006F_01D71645.C9828E50" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdcWbV9u8J8hHlkeTXmHdT9DkviicQ== Content-Language: en-us X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 210311-0, 03/11/2021), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com Archived-At: Subject: [Idr] IDR WG last call for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-01 (3/11 to 3/25/2021) X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:11:58 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_006F_01D71645.C9828E50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This begins a 2 week WG last call for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-01 from 3/11 to 3/25. You can find the draft at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry/ This draft suggest a cleanup on several BGP Extended Community registries in order to replace the "Experimental Use" registration procedure in some entries, since their use is clearly not experimental and thus misleading. In your review comments, please include whether you feel this draft is ready for publication. Since Adrian's registry draft (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry) was improved when sent to a wider audience, we the bess WG to also provide comments. To aid in quick review, I've included a short portion from the Introduction of this draft. Cheers, Sue =============================== [RFC7153] reorganizes the IANA registries for the type values and sub-type values of the BGP Extended Communities attribute. As a result the IANA maintained registry entitled "BGP Transitive Extended Community Types" includes a range of Type Values (0x80-0x8F) with Experimental Use registration procedure. Out of this experimental range the types 0x80, 0x81, 0x82 have been assigned via [RFC5575] and [RFC7674]. The primary use for those types and sub-type registries is non experimental. Section 2 of this document requests the registry cleanup to reflect the actual use of those code-points (removing "Experimental Use" from the sub-type registry names) and changes the registration procedure of the types 0x80, 0x81, 0x82 to first come first serve. ------=_NextPart_000_006F_01D71645.C9828E50 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This = begins a 2 week WG last call for

draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-01 from 3/11 to = 3/25.

 

You can find the draft at:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registr= y/

 

This draft suggest a cleanup on several BGP Extended = Community registries in

order to = replace the "Experimental Use" registration procedure in =

some entries, since their use is = clearly not experimental and thus

misleading.

 

In your = review comments, please include whether you feel this

draft is ready for publication.

 

Since = Adrian’s registry draft (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry) was =

improved when sent to a wider = audience, we the bess WG

to also = provide comments.  To aid in quick review,

I’ve included a short portion from the = Introduction

of this draft. =

 

 

Cheers, Sue =

 

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

[RFC7153] reorganizes the IANA registries for the type = values and

sub-type values of the BGP = Extended Communities attribute.  As a

result the IANA maintained registry entitled "BGP = Transitive Extended

Community = Types" includes a range of Type Values (0x80-0x8F) = with

Experimental Use registration = procedure.  Out of this experimental

range the types 0x80, 0x81, 0x82 have been assigned = via [RFC5575] and

[RFC7674].  = The primary use for those types and sub-type registries

is non experimental.

 

Section 2 = of this document requests the registry cleanup to = reflect

the actual use of those = code-points (removing "Experimental Use" from

the sub-type registry names) and changes the = registration procedure

of the types = 0x80, 0x81, 0x82 to first come first serve.

------=_NextPart_000_006F_01D71645.C9828E50--