Re: [Idr] WG Last Call on Proposed IANA procedures for BGP Well-known communities

Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net> Tue, 12 August 2008 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <idr-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: idr-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-idr-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83653A6924; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:33:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357673A683C for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uyZHoMciHTAY for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og112.obsmtp.com (exprod7og112.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.177]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229673A6A2B for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:32:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.228.6]) by exprod7ob112.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:31:54 PDT
Received: from p-emlb02-sac.jnpr.net ([66.129.254.47]) by p-emsmtp02.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:31:16 -0700
Received: from emailsmtp55.jnpr.net ([172.24.18.132]) by p-emlb02-sac.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:31:16 -0700
Received: from magenta.juniper.net ([172.17.27.123]) by emailsmtp55.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:31:16 -0700
Received: from juniper.net (sapphire.juniper.net [172.17.28.108]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id m7CDVFu94287; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:31:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yakov@juniper.net)
Message-Id: <200808121331.m7CDVFu94287@magenta.juniper.net>
To: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
In-reply-to: <48A0D8D4.8070103@ca.afilias.info>
References: <200808071424.m77EO8u88925@magenta.juniper.net> <48A0505C.7030802@ca.afilias.info> <alpine.LRH.1.10.0808111809550.5177@tor.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> <48A06819.8080002@ca.afilias.info> <alpine.LRH.1.10.0808111922270.5177@tor.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> <48A07825.1010303@ca.afilias.info> <alpine.LRH.1.10.0808112324320.29560@tor.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> <48A0D8D4.8070103@ca.afilias.info>
X-MH-In-Reply-To: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info> message dated "Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:27:00 -0400."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-ID: <96320.1218547875.1@juniper.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:31:15 -0700
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Aug 2008 13:31:16.0324 (UTC) FILETIME=[B2585A40:01C8FC7F]
Cc: 'idr' <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Last Call on Proposed IANA procedures for BGP Well-known communities
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: idr-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: idr-bounces@ietf.org

Brian,

> Thanks to Thomas M. Knoll, there is now a poll available for soliciting 
> opinions regarding the subject of this message.
> 
> (Proposed IANA procedures for BGP Well-known communities.)
> 
> http://www.bgp-qos.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=12
> 
> In the interests of gauging the WG's collective opinions on the general 
> proposal, and on my specific suggestions on how future community 
> proposals might be evaluated, you are all invited to participate in the 
> poll.

Speaking as an IDR WG co-chair, please note that the IDR WG consensus
is determined using the IDR WG mailing list, and not by the results
of the poll you mentioned above.

So, "gauging the WG's collective opinion" on any proposal, is done
on the IDR mailing list, and not by participating in the poll you
mentioned above.

> Of course, follow-ups (either in the forum, or on the IDR list) are also 
> strongly encouraged.
> 
> It's a short poll, just a few questions, but will likely help inform the 
> WG chair as to the sense of the "room".

See above.

Yakov.
  
> Thanks,
> 
> Brian Dickson
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr